Class Notes (839,329)
Canada (511,271)
Sociology (2,990)
SOC 2700 (280)

Crim Theory Chapter 9.docx

8 Pages

Course Code
SOC 2700
Scott Brandon

This preview shows pages 1,2 and half of page 3. Sign up to view the full 8 pages of the document.
Crim Theory Chapter 9 Learning Theories - Learning theories focus on the content of what is learned and the processes by which that learning takes place - Some of these learning theories briefly point to the structural conditions that give rise to the learning in the first place, while others describe these structural conditions more extensively - But in each case, the theories focus on the learning itself, rather than on the underlying structural conditions Basic Psychological Approaches to Learning - Learning refers to habits and knowledge that develop as a result of the experiences of the individual in entering and adjusting to the environment - These are to be distinguished from unlearned or instinctual behaviour, which in some sense is present in the individual at birth and is determined by biology - Aristotle argued that all knowledge is acquired through experience and that none is inborn or instinctive - Basic sensory experiences become associated with each other in the mind because they occur in certain relationships to each other as we interact with the object - He formulated four laws of association that described these relationships - the law of similarity, the law of contrast, the law of succession in time, and the law of coexistence in space - He believed the most complex ideas are all built out of these simple associations between sensory experiences - Associationism has been the dominant learning theory through the centuries to the present - It was the basis for the first experiments on human memory carried out by Ebbinhaus - A major controversy among learning theorists is between behavioural theorists and the cognitive theorists, who retain the original Aristotelian notion that learning takes place because of the association of ideas and factual knowledge - Whereas behaviourists argue that we acquire habits through the association of stimuli with responses, cognitive theorists argue that we acquire factual knowledge through the association of memories, ideas, or expectations - Behaviourists argue that learning occurs primarily through trial and error, while cognitive theorists describe learning as taking place through insight into problem solving - There are 3 basic ways that individuals learn through association - The simplest way is classical conditioning, as described by Pavlov - Some stimuli will reliably produce a given response without any prior training of the organism - The organism is passive and learns what to expect from the environment 23 - In operant conditioning, the organism is active and learns how to get what it wants from the environment - Operant conditioning is associated with B.F Skinner - It uses rewards and punishments to reinforce certain behaviours - A third theory that describes how people learn by association attempts to combine both operant conditioning and elements of psychology - Called social learning theory, it emphasizes the point that behaviour may be reinforced not only through actual rewards and punishments, but through expectations that are learned by watching what happens to other people - Social learning theory is focused on human learning, since it directs attention to higher mental processes - Sutherlands theory of differential association became the first dominant theory in the field and still has a profound effect today Sutherlands Differential Association Theory - His theory has remained unchanged since 1947 and consists of the following nine points - Criminal behaviour is learned, and it is learned in interaction with other persons in a process of communication - The principal part of the learning of criminal behaviour occurs within intimate personal groups - When criminal behaviour is learned, the learning includes a) techniques of committing the crime, which are sometimes very complicated, sometimes very simple, b) the specific direction of the motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes - The specific directions of the motives and drives is learned from definitions of legal codes as favorable or unfavorable. In some societies an individual is surrounded by persons who invariably define the legal codes as rules to be observed, while in others he is surrounded by persons whose definitions are favorable to the violation of the legal codes - A person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions favorable to violation of law over definitions unfavorable to violation of law. This is the principle of differential association - Differential associations may vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity. This means that associations with criminal behaviour and also associations with anticriminal behaviour vary in those respects - The process of learning criminal behaviour by association with criminal and anticriminal patterns involves all of the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning - While criminal behaviour is an expression of general needs and values, it is not explained by those general needs and values, since noncriminal behaviour is an expression of the same needs and values. The attempts by many scholars to explain criminal behaviour by general drives and values, such as the happiness principle, striving for social status, the money motive, or frustration, have been, and must continue to be, futile, since they explain lawful behaviour as completely as they explain criminal behaviour. They are similar to respiration, which is necessary for any behaviour, but which doesnt differentiate criminal from noncriminal behaviour - Sutherlands theory has two basic elements - The content of what is learned includes specific techniques for committing crimes; appropriate motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes; and more general definitions favorable to law violation - In addition, the process by which the learning takes place involves associations with other people in intimate personal groups - Both elements of his theory are derived from symbolic interactionism, a theory developed by George Herbert Mead - Sutherlands description of the content of what is learned was derived from Meads argument that human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings that the things have for them - In Meads theory, a cognitive factor meanings determines behaviour - He argued that people construct relatively permanent definitions of their situation out of the meanings they derive from particular experiences. That is, they generalize the meanings they have derived from particular situations and form a relatively set way of looking at things - Its because of these different definitions that different people in similar situations may act in different ways - Sutherland argued that the key factor in determining whether people violate the law is the meaning they give to the social conditions they experience, rather than the conditions themselves- Ultimately, whether people obey or violate the law depends on how they define their situation - Sutherlands description of the process by which definitions are learned was also derived from Meads theory - Mead argued that the meaning of such things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction on has with ones fellows - Sutherland argued that the meaning of criminal acts arises primarily from the meanings given to these acts by other people with whom the individual associates in intimate personal groups - Sutherland also argued that these associations vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity - He also discussed the general social conditions underlying the differential association process - In the final version of his theory, he argued that there are numerous divergent associations organized around different interests and for different purposes - Under this condition of divergent, differential social organizations, it is inevitable that some of these groups will subscribe to and support criminal patterns of behaviour, others will be essentially neutral, and still others will be definitely anticriminal and self-consciously law abiding - Sutherlands coauthor Cressey substituted the term normative conflict for the term culture conflict after Sutherlands death - Normative conflict refers to the situation in which different social groups hold different views about appropriate ways to behave in specific situations and circumstances - He was clarifying, not changing, Sutherlands argument - Sutherlands theory stated that in a situation of differential social organization and normative conflict, differences in behaviour, including criminal behaviours, arise because of differential associations Research testing Sutherlands Theory - In Sutherlands theory, crime and delinquenc
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2 and half of page 3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.