Class Notes (839,485)
Canada (511,353)
JS380 (30)
Lecture 3

lecture 3.docx

5 Pages
129 Views

Department
Justice Studies
Course Code
JS380
Professor
Stefan Idziak

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
Lecture 3: Aftermath of Pepsi-COla  Albert NB and Newfoundland all prohibit secondary picketin gby statute., even for allies  however, in Alerbta the courts have found that a compelte ban is a charter breach because it went further nthan necessary to avoid economic damage.  In BC GEU v. BC [1988] o Justice McEachern granted an injunctino to himself to stop picekters outside of the courthouse on the basis of contempt of law. o because this was the court acting on its own motion, Dolphin delivery applies to allow the Court to be subject to Charter o however, the court upheld the injunction viewing it as necessary to protect the rights of third parties by ensuring access to the courts.  This ruleing was used in Ontario Public Service Employee's Unon v. ONtario (1996) to uphold an inunction against picketing a courthouse, even though the vidence was that the picketing was not disuading anyone from entering the courthouse. Canadian Forest Products Ltd. (Re) [2007] BCLRBD Facts  HEU was involved in labour dispute with health care employers over new collective agreement o legislated back to work with new agreement o HEU had a few days of protest instead, some of which was found to be illegal picketing  some HEU workers went to the D's mill, had placards on and congregated outside gate  Started off as an information picket, taking to wrokers as they drove into work o didn't block line or anything  Leader of group changes it into a "official picket" o Mill unit starts refusing to come into work o management tells the picketers they will be liable if people didn't come to work o mill shuts down  none of the mil workers joined the picket, just went home  Board issues cease and desist order, picketers leave  So basically we have a picket that started of as informational and a legitimate protest o which turned into "signal effect picketing" o which stopped the Canfor workers from coming in.  Not totally clear the degree to which the HEU ordered the strike Analysis  in order to get reconsideration, must demonsrate a "good arguable case of sufficient merit that it may succeed on one of the established grounds for reconsideration".  basically Union is arguing this wasn't a strike, this was a legitimate political protest that the Cdoe does not cover o one the "back to work" legislation was passed, this changed from a labour dispute to a political protest, so board lost jurisdiction o no. o had the union gone back to work and protested outside working hours, it could have been political o but instead they used work stoppage as economic stoppage with the intent to improve the bargain o so not a "political protest", but a labour dispute with political overtones.  Union also argues that since the BC defintion of picketing was struck down in KMart Canada, there is now an unrestricted right to communciate as long as the communication is not ceorcive or intimidating o nope, the restrictions in the code that cover picketing still apply, notwithstanding the current absence of a statutory definition of picketing  Here, the informational incident was not a picketline, but once it went "official" it became a picket, and had a signal effect, according to the orginal board anyways. o thus it is possible to wear placards and so on that are different from "signal effect" picketing.  So how do we know the protest became a picket? o the HEU rep called it "official picket lines" o the conduct constituted a group of people who had congregated at the enterance of a remote unionized workplace just before shift change with placards  so it is picketing because it is identified as such by the people doing it, and because it is clearly the kind of conduct recognizable as picketing in BC o you could have a protest or congregation, even with placards, but once you try and stop union members from crossing the line, this is picketing  Canfor's application o Canfor wants to hold HEU liable for the actions of members o the original board did not think the evidence was clear enough that the HEU had intentionally done this o review will only be available here on palpable and overriding error test, which was not made out here  the board's decision was not the only one that could have been made out, but it was reasonable. o on the other hand, the board appeared to err in finding that there was "no evidence" that HEY authorized the picketing of the mill  there was consdierable circumstantial evidence presented by Canfor that suggested HEU authorize the strike.  while weighing is up to the board, this suggests there was an error.  so the question will be remitted.  Can the union be held vicariously liable? o Canfor says the union should be held liable for authorize and direct its members to go to the mill entrance and engage in political protest, since these acts were so connected to the illegal strike.  the original board believed it was without jurisdiction to hear this argument, but this is incorrect o basicaly, it is an open quetion whether the HEU violated the code even if it idid not authorize illegal picketing by its members. o normally when union or employer breachs the code, it is because of the actions of the members, not the institution itself  manager illegal terminates, for example. o often the institution will argue that the individual member acted without their knowledge and authorization, and so the union or employer should not be held liable. o the board does have the jurisdiction to find a union h as breached the Code where its members have negaged in illegal picketing, includig where the union did not authorize the illegal picketing  union has responsibility to ensure its members
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit