🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →

HomeClass Notes1,200,000CA670,000

RLST 112 Lecture : RLST 110 (61)

16 views3 pages

blushchimpanzee546

7 Jan 2012

School

Department

Religious Studies

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

>ultimate=1ontologically (the branch of metaphysics that deals with the nature of being) real. >transformation=religion brings us to transformation, there needs to be a reason to change thus: human flaw->place of suffering that needs to be escaped. >provides a solution-how are we supposed to make right. >towards=process of moving from where we are to a better place. >means=the method used to get to a better place, religions are not pure however can be thought of as methods or models. B:god, guilt, and death by merold e. westphal. Not the right context on earth->not fulfilling b/c it doesn t live out our spiritual means. Mythical->ex. when ur going hunting u should only bring the weapons that past deities used . : the practice of using the same weapons as the deity is not as important as having a clean spirit. Goal: original purity->ex. escape goat->when all of ur sins are cast upon this goat.

Related Documents

REL 320 Study Guide - Midterm Guide: Infant Baptism, Immanuel Kant, Voluntary Association

viridianalligator183

EDUC 2000 Lecture : EDCI2001notes

azuremammoth471

Related Questions

Please help with all questions. Will rate ASAP.

This question addresses inverse transformations from a conceptual standpoint, a. Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from A to A takes some nonzero vector x to 0. Can this transformation be reversed? Does A exist? Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from is not one-to-one. What does that tell you about the set of vectors b that can be produced by applying the transformation T to all vectors x in A? How do you know, in that case, that the transformation T is not reversible (i.e. that there does not exist an inverse transformation with the standard matrix A-1 that can be applied to the result of Ax to restore the vector x to its original value)? Suppose that a linear transformation T: x rightarrow Ax from A to A is not onto. What does that tell you about the set of vectors b that can be produced by applying the transformation T to all vectors x in A? Is it possible for a linear transformation x rightarrow Ax from A to A to be one-to-one but not onto, or onto but not one-to-one? If so, please give examples of each case. If not, explain why not. Is it possible for an arbitrary linear transformation x rightarrow Ax from A to B to be one-to-one but not onto, or onto but not one-to-one? If so. please give examples of each case. If not, explain why not. For what values of {a. b. c, d. e.f. a. h. i.j } will the matrix A = invertible? what is the least amount of partitioning that needs to be applied to M; to make M1 and M2 conformable for block multiplication? What is the product M = M1, M2 that you obtain using block multiplication with these partitions? What is the product M = M1 M2. that you obtain by multiplying the two matrices without partitioning? For which three values of a is the matrix B = not invertible, and why If M1 and M2 arc partitioned matrices such that M1 For each matrix product shown below, draw in the partitions that would need to be added to make the multiplication possible: Describe in general how the sizes of each of the partitions(#rows, #columns) in a matrix product C = AB are defined by the sizes of the partitions in each of the matrices A and B when partitioned matrices are multiplied.