Class Notes (836,273)
Canada (509,735)
Biology (2,256)
BIOL 240 (251)
Josh Neufeld (103)
Lecture

Topic 14.pdf

5 Pages
124 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Biology
Course
BIOL 240
Professor
Josh Neufeld
Semester
Fall

Description
Fall 2012 TOPIC 14: DETERMINING CAUSAL AND RISK FACTORS FOR NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES In this lecture, we will begin to study the ways in which we assess causal factors and risk factors for common chronic diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. We’ve already seen that we cannot determine the risk factors by identifying the nature of the causal agent (such as is the case with a pathoetiological diagnosis). Therefore, unlike in the case of infectious diseases, we will need to establish new methods for determining the causal pathway from the healthy state to the diseased state and, therefore, for identifying the risk factors that increase one’s risk for the disease. RECOMMENDED READINGS 1. This link is to a website devoted to scientific research and design. Although there are some deviations from standard definitions in their discussions, it is still an informative source for basic information regarding various types of research designs. http://explorable.com/research-designs.html LECTURE NOTES: 1. INTRODUCTION — when we wish to establish the causal and risk factors determining variability in incidence rates of non-communicable diseases such as cancer and heart disease, we are asking “which exposures increase disease risk?” — often, epidemiological evidence suggests the nature of the exposure — in this case, we then even more advanced questions such as: — what duration of the exposure is critical for risk of disease? — what is the optimal timing of the exposure for risk of disease? — what is the interval between exposure and the beginning of the symptomatic phase of the natural history of the disease? — to answer these questions, we use research designs: i) Experimental Designs 1) Randomized Control Trial — randomly assign subjects to groups — expose 1 group to a treatment/intervention, risk factor, etc. — measure outcome after a specific interval 211212 HLTH 101 Fall 2012 Experimental Group (exposure) Random Assignment a Control Group (no exposure) — “gold standard” for proof — but: — first, we must decide which exposures to apply — we also must decide what duration and timing of the exposure to use, and what interval between the exposure and outcome measurement to use — also, sometimes we cannot satisfy ethical considerations using an RCT 2) Pre-Post Study — everyone in the study gets exposed to a particular factor — assessments are made both before and after the exposure Assess Exposure Assess — but: — these designs often do not show causality — maturation of subjects, and regression to the mean are just two examples of ways in which the results of these studies can be spurious ii) Quasi-experimental Designs 1) Case-Control Study (observational study) — compare the group with a particular outcome (i.e., a particular disease) versus a group w
More Less

Related notes for BIOL 240

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit