Class Notes (783,847)
Canada (480,840)
LS 101 (209)
Lecture

LS101 - Sept.24.doc

6 Pages
105 Views
Unlock Document

School
University of Waterloo
Department
Legal Studies
Course
LS 101
Professor
Frances Chapman
Semester
Summer

Description
LS 101 - Sept.24 24/09/2007 19:54:00 ← HISTORY OF LAW ← ← *dates and names will not be relevant for the exam, although the general flow will be required ← ← Stare decisis (LATIN TERMS, STATUTES IN ITALICS) • To stand by decided cases, must follow that precedent • Lends to consistency and predictability • Judges were not making law but discovering legal principles that were already there and coming to a just decision • Therefore, all judges after were bound by that decision ← ← Ratio Decidendi • E.g. ‘There is no property in a witness’ (both sides can question the same witness) • The ‘ratio’ or principle of the case • Final judgment in a case is often the ratio (*read a case online*) • E.g. Donoghue vs. Stevenson o First real product liability case where a woman found a decomposing snail at the bottom of a ginger ale bottle o Ratio: a person owes a duty of a care to those who can be reasonably foreseen to have….(finish) • Ratio is the only body of the case that is binding – which is why it is often such a heated point of discussion ← ← *R v. Chapman would be said “The Crown and Chapman” (v. = and, NOT versus) ← ← Obiter Dicta • Words in passing that the judge says • Everything around the ratio is called obiter (for short) • None of it is binding, although it can be persuasive • Foreign law can be persuasive to our law in Canada although it is not binding • If nothing in Canada explains a case here, the first country that will be looked at is the UK and British cases can have an influence on decisions • American cases are difficult to apply because each state has its own criminal law ← ← Ultra Vires • Going outside of your jurisdiction – will be said to be ultra vires • Administrative tribunals ← ← Distinguishing the cases • If there are many cases that oppose your position, and you need to get around precedent, it is necessary to prove that your case is different • Not overruling the other cases but showing that your case is differe ← ← Supreme Court of Canada is binding on all the provinces. ← Court of Appeal is specific to provinces and its decisions will be binding in its own province (only persuasive in other provinces) ← ← Precedents • Advantages o Predictable o Practical o Can make small, incremental changes (can change the decision slightly over different cases – small changes can
More Less

Related notes for LS 101

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit