LS202 Lecture Notes - Constitution Act, 1982, Parliamentary Sovereignty, Exigent Circumstance
This preview shows half of the first page. to view the full 3 pages of the document.
The Charter, Criminal Procedure and Evidence (parts 1-3)
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Part 1: Constitution Act, 1982
Charter of Rights and Freedoms (charter) which was created under the constitution
o Parliamentary supremacy
The philosophy that the Parliament or legislature (properly acting) can enact or repeal
any law that it chooses.
o Division of powers
Set out in the Constitution
o Empower judge
Does not have to enforce if it does not follow the Constitution
o Roles of different laws and how they work together, and provides mechanisms for how they
can be changed
Something is beyond the federal or provincial government's power and con override
o This allows check on government power
If the judge sees that the application is not being properly used, they can send it back
to parliament or strike it down
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
s. 7 of the Charter provides that "everyone has the right to life, liberyt and the security of person"
o What is life??? Fetus
o Security of person? What are the factors that go into it?
Strike down: the courts CAN but they use it in a measured way, they strike it down as little as
o Reading down: interpreted as narrowly as possible; less inclusive
o Reading in:
Criminal Procedure - search warrant
Police and government investigators power to search and seize
Charter- "secure against unreasonable search and seizure
o Search and seizure: a police practice where they can search property and seize evidence
that may be needed in the investigation and prosecution of crime
o Controlled Drugs and Substances Act; there are special rules when searching for drugs
11(7) provides that if by "reason of exigent circumstances it would be impracticable to
obtain" a warrant
Have 'reasonable and probable grounds to search for evidence"
Charter - Exclusion of Evidence
Way evidence is collected
"bring the administration of justice into disrepute"
R. v. Feeney (1997)
You're Reading a Preview
Unlock to view full version