Class Notes (836,591)
Canada (509,862)
PACS 201 (55)
Lecture 2

Lecture - Week 2.docx

3 Pages
122 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Peace and Conflict Studies
Course
PACS 201
Professor
Nathan Funk
Semester
Winter

Description
POPULAR IMAGES OF HUMAN NATURE Tacit knowledge about conflict and violence:  Past experience  Media  Social expectations Violence and peace in the public mind: (movies)  “nonviolent stories”—comedy, kids, family, romance  “violent stories”—horror, thrillers, war movies, action adventure, video games VIOLENCE AS A FUNCTION OF INNATE HUMAN AGGRESSION Aggression: A Multi-Dimensional Concept  Wide range of meanings in common usage  Does not always entail violence  Minimalism = assertiveness, firmness, involve someone energetic in pursuit of solution to a problem or challenging someone’s statement or conviction  Maximalism = unprovoked attack, invasion of someone else’s territory  Used with idea of hostility  Psychological manifestation to challenge others  Anxiety/territorial/possessive/dominance-related aggression  Element of fear that is part of the impetus for aggression Instinctivism  Direct link between genetics and violence  Konrad Lorenz: aggression as an innate drive - animals have genetically fixed action patterns; aggression is one of them - aggression has species-preserving function - extrapolated from animal kingdom to human behaviour  war is “in our genes” Socio-biology  Explains behaviour of animals in relation to evolutionary pressures and “natural selection”  Nature AND nurture  i.e. if humans have capacity to be aggressive today, it’s because aggressive behaviour has served the species well and thus, have been encoded in our species repertoire  aggressiveness = adaptive evolutionary behaviour  i.e. Edward O. Wilson: there is a capacity to social learning to suppress certain behaviours and draw out others, and it is enough for aggressive patterns to be evoked under certain patterns or conditions Psychoanalysis  unconscious forces motivate human behaviour: “Eros and Thanatos” (Life vs Death)  deep down, people are not civilized, primitive and hard to govern  we have achieved civilization through repression of these instinctive forces and behaviours  thus, we are not adjusted and we can only be better adjusted  believed human beings are narcissistic; collective narcissism as a source of rivalry - humans are always insecure with mortality and own identity Early Political Theory  Thomas Hobbes and The Leviathan: - believed that a secure social order is only possible through strong political authority - without “a common Power to keep them all in awe”, people regress to “a war…of every man, against every man”  Hobbes saw human condition as: - competitive, diffident (distrust of others), and in the pursuit of glory - “state of nature” = violent anarchy - need for hierarchy to create society Assessing “Innate Aggression” Explanations for Violence View of human nature:  Egocentric, insecure, impulsive, deeply conflicted, needing external control or discipline (pessimistic) Think:  How accurate and/or complete is this account of
More Less

Related notes for PACS 201

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit