Class Notes (837,488)
Canada (510,274)
PACS 201 (55)
Lecture

Week 7-Sources of Conflict and Conflict Resolution.pdf

13 Pages
121 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Peace and Conflict Studies
Course
PACS 201
Professor
Nathan Funk
Semester
Summer

Description
WEEK 7-SOURCES OF CONFLICT AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION 7a Introduction to the Conflict Resolution Paradigm *If we want to prevent violence and create conditions favourable for peace, what should we do? ▯ - According to the Power Politics Paradigm... ▯ ▯ ~arm yourself, be prepared ▯ -According to the World Order Paradigm... ▯ ▯ ~bolster global governance, institutionalizing cooperation, get consensus ▯ ▯ on norms, ▯ -According to the Conflict Resolution Paradigm... ▯ ▯ ~conflict is inevitable but violence doesn’t have to be, danger and ▯ ▯ opportunity, work on the relationship, develop good skills for dealing with ▯ ▯ differences, become a better analyst, CONFLICT RESOLUTION *not just about ending fights/wars or negotiating agreements *also about increasing our capacity to deal with conflict-without violence *expanding our “toolbox” of social and political practices ▯ ~if all we have is a hammer everything else just looks like a nail ▯ ~not always win/lose scenario-needs to be mutual benefit VARIATION IN TERMINOLOGY *Conflict Resolution *Conflict Management (more cautious) ▯ ~we may not be able to resolve many conflicts but we can try to keep them within ▯ non-destructive parameters ▯ ~can limit violence *Conflict Transformation ▯ ~transform the character of the conflict by making it less violent while ▯ simultaneously empowering those who are weaker to seek social justice ▯ ~conflict may be a good thing, but it just needs to be waged less violently, in a ▯ way that will correct underlying injustices over the long term without producing a ▯ quick settlement or resolution BASIC CONFLICT RESOLUTION ASSUMPTIONS *Focusing on relationships can produce new insight into sources and dynamics of conflict ▯ -institutions, structures, and the characteristics of individuals still matter ▯ ▯ ~Power Politics Paradigm-more on presumed innate characteristics of ▯ ▯ individuals, or of states as actors ▯ ▯ ~World Order Paradigm-more on institutions, structures, about the way the ▯ ▯ world is organized ▯ ▯ ~Conflict Resolution Paradigm-that’s all important but we have to look at ▯ ▯ the quality of the way different actors are relating to each other-trust/ ▯ ▯ distrust, attitudes towards one another, the history of the relationship, - But human interactions are dynamic and involve “the whole human being” (intellect + emotion) ▯ ▯ ~conflict between individuals-don’t just focus on who is virtuous and who ▯ ▯ is not virtuous-need to look at the history of their relationship, their ▯ ▯ interactions ▯ ▯ ~the same between states *Attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours that fuel destructive conflicts can be changed ▯ ▯ ~are transformable if we know the right process ▯ -improved methods, and processes for handling conflict can produce better (less ▯ destructive, more productive) outcomes ▯ ▯ ~affirmation...people can change ▯ ▯ ~when conflict causes confusion, we can work it out ▯ -effective communication and problem solving are essential of we are to benefit ▯ from conflict rather than suffer from it ▯ ▯ ~conflict is potentially positive, but there is a need to establish that ▯ ▯ connection 7b Sources of Social Conflict *SLIDE CONFLICT *Perceived incompatibility of actions or goals ▯ ~hockey fight conflict-they both can’t win, one may have broken the rules ▯ ~conflict over how one should behave ▯ ~disagreement over the rules of the game can be as destructive as rivalry implicit ▯ in the game itself *What are some of the major sources of conflict in our world? LENSES FOR STUDYING CONFLICT *Psychological ▯ ~personalities and perceptions *Political ▯ ~factions struggling for power, seeking to pursue their objectives, roles of ▯ institutions and interests *Economic ▯ ~how competition for material things drives conflict-money, trade, land, ▯ resources, profit, predation, exploitation *Social (status) (Sociology) ▯ ~social status, ranking of groups, scarcity of high rank vs lower rank, feelings of ▯ social solidarity, group loyalty, *Cultural (anthropology) ▯ ~culture, value differences, identity, us and them, ~conflict resolution-inter-disciplinary, multi-disciplinary ~bring different insights together ~sometimes eclectic sometimes more integrated KEASHLY & WARTERS: FOUR PERSPECTIVES ON THE NATURE AND CAUSES OF CONFLICT (text pp 36-43) *Individual characteristics perspective (p37) ▯ -instinct, personality traits, learned responses ▯ ▯ ~ innate or learned (from earlier lectures) *Social structural perspective (p38) ▯ -unequal access to resources (class, gender, race) ▯ ▯ ~more in World Order Paradigm *Social process perspective* (p39) ▯ -social interactions of individuals/groups (perceptions, interpretations, attitudes, ▯ behaviours, communications) ▯ ▯ ~relationships and the the perceptions/interpretations linked to these ▯ ▯ ~important in the Conflict Resolution Paradigm ▯ ▯ ~one of the main areas of development in the Conflict Resolution ▯ ▯ Paradigm ▯ ▯ ~more significant than the reading states *Formal perspective (p41) ▯ -game theory (rational actors in situations with incentives for conflict/cooperation) ▯ ▯ Prisoner’s Dilemma Payoff COOPERATE DEFECT Matrix COOPERATE 3, 3 0, 5 DEFECT 5, 0 1, 1 ▯ ▯ “AGGRESSOR-DEFENDER” MODELS OF CONFLICT -perceived divergence of interest (someone decides they are going to force a solution) ▯ Aggressor’s behaviour Defender’s behaviour ~has some resemblance to real world processes, we can think of a time when this really happened ~critique-life is usually more complicated , too simplistic, too one sided ~pro-simple “CONFLICT SPIRAL” MODELS OF CONFLICT -perceived divergence of interest ▯ Heavy tactics used by Party A Changes in Party B Changes in Party A ▯ ▯ Heavy tactics used by Party B ~more influential ~more recognition and respect ~changes in Party B-defensiveness- may also seek punitive responses, psychological changes ~blame, anger, arousal ~may be a social change-change in organization ie-Nation-mobilization for war, change in leadership, shift in identity, ~changes in Party A-reinforcement, psychological changes, social changes, social organization changes, ~process continues ~even in an asymmetrical situation where we think we are contributing less than the other we can still try to identify ways in which our actions feed into the spiral-there is something we can take responsibility for in the search for transformation of the situation ~actions on both sides that reinforce certain responses on the other and there is a tendency to entrap ourselves mutually in conflict unless we can think our way out of the spiral 7c Analyzing Macro-Level Cases ▯ 7c1 Poverty and Armed Conflict POVERTY AND ARMED CONFLICT: STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITIES *slide* map of conflict ~a disproportionate number of armed conflicts in the world are in: ▯ ~ poorer countries ▯ ~where there is an intersection of risk factors ▯ ~there is a smaller part of the economic pie to divide ▯ ~stakes of competition for resources are higher ▯ ~country may rely on certain commodities that can be captured or looted or ▯ controlled ▯ ~central government may have less legitimacy and efficiency or effective ▯ sovereignty ▯ ~lack of a strong national identity ▯ ~more vulnerable to external interventions ▯ ~armed conflict harms the economic well being of most players-economic ▯ opportunities for a small minority-gun runners, access to resources that can be ▯ controlled NEPAL ~most beautiful country AND the poorest ~north of India and south of Tibet ~per capita income $265/year (2004) ~80% involved in agriculture ~high degree of economic inequality ~concentrated land ownership ~wealth distribution falls along caste lines along with land ownership ~FUNK observations: ▯ ~malnutrition for some children (not all), subsist on less between growing ▯ seasons, high rate of indebtedness (cyclical) ~1996 civil war started-12000+ deaths, 100000+ internally displaced, ~was struggling to establish a constitutional monarchy (democratic process)...coup from the palace-now at an impasse ~great dal of scarcity, developmental inequality-conditions ripe for a civil war SIERRA LEONE ~west Africa ~founded by free slaves-capitol Freetown 1791 ~civil war 1991-1999 ~not only struggle for power but also wealth available from resources-DIAMONDS ~complex conflict ~we know about it because of the atrocities-instilling fear ~50000+died ~2000000 (1/3 of population) internally displaced ~under control by regional & international peacekeeping forces ~gave term ‘blood diamonds’ ▯ 7c2 Collective Identity and Nationalism ~macro level conflicts ~what it means to be part of a group-first person plural ‘we’ ~most conflicts are within states and about states-do we want to be members in this ▯ state? What group should be ruling the state? Which group has power? *Primordialism-identity is static, deeply rooted, independent of relationships ▯ ~enduring across time, timeless, ▯ ~something essential and consistent about ethnic, national , religious, identities ▯ ~identities are not subject to change ▯ ~increasing criticism *Constructivism-identities change over time in response to historical experiences, ▯ relationships with other groups, and new ideas ▯ ~self/other relationships ▯ ~Canada can be used as an example ie multicultural *Instrumentalism-identities are manipulated to advance political and economic interests *slide* ▯ ~ manipulation of ethnic identity in many contemporary conflict scenarios is done ▯ by people who are trying to increase their own share of the pie (leaders or ▯ represent groups by interest) ▯ ~promoting self-determination by different groups in Europe, or other parts of the ▯ world, in a way that some might read that and say that advanced a certain ▯ strategic interest vis-a-vis other great powers at the time ▯ ~after WWII the idea of the West as a political entity suddenly became a major ▯ factor in international political discourse-the West wasn’t that big before-now you ▯ have West vs East? Soviet Union (& allies) trying to make an identity for strategic ▯ reasons ~complexity, change, interests GREECE, TURKEY, AND IMIA/KARDAK ~long history of conflict ~still often experience tensions over control of islands and seaways, air space ~didn’t trust one another their identities were opposed to one another ~1996-tensions over ‘rocks’-rocky islands in the Agean sea-Greeks=Imia & Turkey=Kardak and each state claimed sovereign rights ~close to war-NATO intervened and the conflict simmered down ~1999 earthquake in Turkey-Greeks sent a relief team, then earthquake in Athens-Turks sent in a relief team now sympathy/empathy? ~how different or similar are we to others? ▯ 7c3 Refugees and Displaced people CYPRUS ~4/5 Greek, 1/5 Turkish ~stand off between resident Greeks and Turks for several decades ~was under British rule late 19th century-1960 ~then Greeks & Turks couldn’t agree how to share power ~Greek coup on 1974 ~Turkey launched a military operation with the stated purpose of protecting Turkish Cypriots from ‘ethnic cleansing’ ~island partitioned with military force on each side ~still unresolved ~refugee flows both directions ~Turkish ‘peace operation’/Greek ‘invasion’ ▯ 7c4 Escalation as a Consequence of Unresolved Tensions and Unmet s d e e ▯ N *slide* ~can’t understand contemporary conflict if you don’t understand that there are deep underlying needs that if unmet can lead to violence and if met can lead to security ~need to try to find out the fundamental needs of different groups ~big one is Identity-the need to preserve ones own ethnic, cultural, linguistic identity THE KURDS *slide* ~they are a stateless people ~don’t know how many there are~25000000-largest group of stateless people ~Kurds have strong sense of identity-not reflected in a state & because the states they’re in don’t recognize their nationalism and have often been antagonistic to it trying to impose another language, another culture ~ unrest in many countries with Kurds living there ~basic need for identity and if not addressed then there will be conflict ~own enemy in internal divisiveness-will bond over common culture ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONF
More Less

Related notes for PACS 201

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit