Class Notes (837,998)
Canada (510,614)
Philosophy (272)
PHIL 215 (40)
Lecture

PHIL215-2012-10-04-ProfessorBrianOrend.pdf

6 Pages
81 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 215
Professor
Brian Orend
Semester
Fall

Description
Are you a good notes-taker? Looking for a collaborator: e-mail me at [email protected] PHIL 215 Lecture #4 Today: 1. Codes of Ethics 2. Whistle-Blowing 1. Codes of Ethics: Business: - Internal to a business (Magna) - Industry-Wide (Forestry) Professional: - More serious, more detailed - Consequences for violation - Disciplinary process - Legalized, formalized Properties of Code of Ethics: - Deontological + Rules (Duty-based + Results) - Consequentialist Example: Code of Ethics and Conduct for Stock Brokers. Insider Trading: When corporate executives trade the stocks of their own company. (When it comes to the stock market, government wants it to be as fair and transparent as possible) Example: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario: Rules of Professional Conduct. “Puffery”: Self-promotion through advertising to “puff yourself up”. Canadian lawyers are forbidden from making TV ads to promote themselves, in contrast to US TV networks. Example: Professional Engineers Act (Must pass technical tests, ethics test, prove good character) The Takeaway: Code of Ethics are often detailed and lengthy Code of Ethics (Common Elements) *Note*: Use these as the duties for deontology argument on the exams. 1. Obey all relevant laws 2. No disgracing the business, organization or profession 3. Competence & Non-impairment 4. Diligence / Hard-working-ness 5. Honesty & Full Disclosure 6. No Conflicts of Interest (Unless full disclosure & universal consent of “stake-holders”) 7. Trustworthiness & Confidentiality 8. Respect / Collegiality towards colleagues, peers & clients (Professionals Codes also have:) 9. Some Reference to Upholding a Public Good (e.g. lawyers -> justice, doctors -> health, engineers -> public safety) 10. “Advance the Profession”: i.e., A) Mentor & develop juniors and B) Take advantage of opportunities to enhance public esteem of profession 11. Reference to a Disciplinary Mechanism & Duty to Report all Ethical Violations to such. Aside: Shareholder vs. Stakeholder: - Shareholder: people who hold shares in the company - Stakeholder: anyone who are affected by decisions made by the company Disciplinary Mechanisms: Very different between the business side and profession side Business: - Informal: - H.R. - In-house legal counsel - recommend to CEO - take an ethics course - pay a fine - in some cases, termination of employment - Not all businesses have codes of ethics (Though all large public companies have them) Profession: - Formal / Quasi-Legal - “Self-Regulating”: (because engineers should know how to govern engineers, but not doctors) - Bodies of Expertise that determines detailed ethics (C.M.A., P.E.O., L.S.U.C) - Exams a code of ethics - Grant / revoke license (Generally a criminal record would fail the good character test) - Ethics Committee: 9 Senior members: 1. Initiated by some complaint 2. Fact-Finding Session (without players, dismissed if no grounds are found) 3. “Trial”: Lawyers are present 4. “Sentencing Phase” → Dismiss 5. Options & Punishment (e.g. rewrite ethics exam, pay for the cost of the “trial”, temporary / permanent suspension of license) Pros & Cons of Codes of Ethics (CoE): CONs -> LADD PROs 1. “Rigid Rule-Worship” 1. May not always be crystal-clear or 2. Serious Problem Interpreting Rules: motivating, but sometimes it might be; Vagueness (e.g. “personal honour”, “treat therefore still worthwhile. everyone with respect”) 2. Floor / Ceiling: CoE can articulate the 3. CoE doesn’t contain anything that’s not ideals & expectations of a business / already in ordinary morality. profession (which is inspiring / motivating). 4. Purpose of CoE? LADD: “These things Floor - minimum expectations; Ceiling - are exercises of public relations, done in the maximal inspiration. interest of the business / profession” (KPMG: 3. Give self-regulating bodies a way to kick Over 85% of CEOs said they adopted CoE for people out business interest) 4. Communication: Convey to outsiders what 5. Codes of Ethics are useless: A) ethical they can expect from insiders. people don’t need a code of ethics to know 5. (Response to CON#3) Crucial thing that what to do, B) unethical people won’t follow CoE do is to capture additional obligations CoE anyway.
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 215

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit