Class Notes (834,037)
Canada (508,290)
Psychology (2,075)
PSYCH 211 (221)
Lecture 18

PSYCH 211: Lecture 18 Notes

4 Pages
91 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYCH 211
Professor
Mathieu Le Corre
Semester
Fall

Description
1. Taking a step back: what Piaget & Kohlberg have in common -Kohlberg says this transition applies to ALL moral judgement -Kids justification of judgement change enormously over time -adult moral reasoning is very different from that of a child -the way we decide if something is acceptable or not is a conscious process of arguing with ourselves if something is right or wrong -gut feeling that incest is wrong (not debating in our heads like “well, it might result in a mutant baby, but wait, she’s sterile, so it shouldn’t matter, etc.) -we make moral judgements through decisions that are not based on conscious, deliberate reasoning in our minds 2. -there’s something flawed with Piaget & Kohlberg’s approach -avoidance of guilt may be a reason why we act morally -suggestion 1: when there’s violence involved, we don’t like it -suggestion 2: you cannot do harm as a means to an end -the method used to save the 5 involves killing the football player (this DOES use harm as a means to an end) -people still don’t know the reason behind our gut feelings of moral reasoning -it takes hard work to figure out how our gut feelings work 5. Where do these moral intuitions come from? -one way to learn is if people just tell us (but this doesn’t work in novel situations such as the scenarios with saving 5 people or 1) -suggestion: if we’re in a situation of conflict, do the action that will result in the greatest good -this doesn’t always work (ex. with the saving 1 vs. 5) -is it culture, is it not? What’s 1 way to figure out whether we learned this or not? -give similar scenarios to 3 and 4 year olds 6. The trolley & footbridge problems in 3 and 4 year olds 8. 3-year-olds make the same judgements as adults -all would rather flip the switch instead of physically push the football player in front of the boulder -across cultures and socioeconomic status we see the same patterns of judgement -maybe we’re innately wired to dislike hurting people, maybe we’re against killing as a means to an end; researchers are still trying to figure it out 9. Taking a step back: what Piaget & Kohlberg have in common -adults and kids are really different (according to P and K) -not so i
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 211

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit