Class Notes (836,580)
Canada (509,856)
Psychology (2,075)
PSYCH 230 (136)
Lecture 4

PSYCH 230: Week 4 Lecture 2.docx

3 Pages
122 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYCH 230
Professor
Chris Burris
Semester
Fall

Description
Week 4: Lecture 2 Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:03 AM Brief History of Profiling  Hunters/trackers o You have to keep record of evidence  Criminalistic o 1200s:  The whole idea whether physical evidence can be useful to solve crimes  Around when finger prints were discovered (Chinese discovery)  "lay" psychology o We form impressions of people; based on subtle clues  What they wear, put on their "wall" o Making the assumption that what they surround themselves with, is what they are interested in (tells you about that person)  Criminal typing o Lombroso  High brow: more intellectual  Low brow: more criminal  Psychoanalysis o The Mad Bomber case  Left bombs in difference places with notes; people noticed he made his "w" a certain way  FBI o Try to make the case that they discovered profiling o They were one of the first groups that tried to collect data; looked at 40 different offenders to see if there was anything in common  Empiricists o "you need to collect more data; you cant just rely on random "facts"" Core Assumptions of Profiling 1. Criminal behaviour is subject to the same set of "grand law" of human behaviour to which noncriminal behaviour is subject a. Crimes are not different species; are human... Kinda obvious... b. When you are the victim, you might not have this thinking however.... Your thinking may not be rational c. The hardest part is figuring out why they are thinking that way; there are rewards... Maybe not the rewards we think is rewarding B=f (P, E), where E= (V+C) o Behaviour is a behaviour of the person and the environment o B= offender behaviour o P= offender characteristics o E= Environment  V= victim  C= context THE TASK OF PROFILING?? Solve for P!!! o Its not just situational 2. Profiling is a psychological (attributional) task. a. Attribution: has to do with how we explain events ( "why did that happen") b. A profiler is trying to ask a specific version of the question c. "what is it about them that contributed to that process What: When: Where----------> HOW----------> WHY---------------------> " WHO" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Physical event Evidence-----------------> reconstruction-----------------> profile -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- behaviour> ... Trying to get inside their head intentions> characteristics ***IN an id
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 230

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit