Class Notes (836,254)
Canada (509,721)
Psychology (2,075)
PSYCH 253 (142)
Lecture

Module C: Social Psych in Court very detailed lecture notes including explanations of all video clips, class demonstrations, and exercises.

3 Pages
76 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYCH 253
Professor
Emiko Yoshida
Semester
Fall

Description
Social Psychology in Court Mystery  Clip – rape of Jennifer – identified rapist as Cotton, sentenced to life in prison, DNA proved that other man was real rapist  Why did Jennifer misidentify the perpetrator? How could this be prevented?  Eyewitness is very persuasive (“I saw the person” – no reason for her to lie)  However, memories are malleable and tend to be influenced by various factors – misinformation effect, feedback  People tend to believe confident eyewitnesses Eyewitness Testimony  Very persuasive but not reliable  Faulty memory is the major cause of wrongful convictions – in 180 cases DNA evidence exonerated someone; 75% of these cases, conviction was because of faulty eyewitness identification  Jurors and law enforcement professionals rely on eyewitnesses  Study – Loftus, 1975, 1979  3 conditions in robbery/murder case: 1. Circumstantial evidence only 2. Circumstantial evidence plus eyewitness declaring “That’s the one!” 3. Circumstantial evidence, eyewitness declaring “that’s the one!” defense lawyer discredits witness because of bad vision  DV: percentage voting to convict  Results: o 20% voted to convict with only circumstantial evidence o 70% with circumstantial + eye witness o Even if witness was discredited, still a high percentage voted to convict o Eye witnesses tend to be persuasive even when:  Condition is poor  Provided detailed but unrelated information Why are Eyewitnesses Often Wrong?  Clip – Whodunit – 21 changes in scenery throughout the clip  Information people notice and pay attention to is also influenced by what they expect to see  Crime usually occurs when you are not expecting it – easy to miss critical information when witness a crime  Research has confirmed that people are poor at noticing the unexpected Weapon Focus  Focus on a weapon – salient  When people pay attention to the salient weapon they have an inability to remember other details (ex. criminal’s face)  Study – 2 conditions: a customer pointed a gun at the cashier vs. handed the cahier a cheque  People paid more attention to the gun than to the cheque  Worse memory of the suspect’s face in the gun condition than in the cheque condition Misinformation Effect  Remembering wrong information  Study – 2 (signs: stop vs. yield) x 2 (asked question about: stop vs. yield)  Car stopped at a stop sign vs. yield sign  “Did another car pass the car while it was stopped at the stop/yield sign?”  Asked which photo they saw  People were only 41% correct when they saw a stop sign but were asked about a yield sign, or they saw a yield sign but were asked about a stop sign  Denied seeing what th
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 253

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit