Class Notes (835,108)
Canada (508,934)
Psychology (2,075)
PSYCH 291 (44)


5 Pages
Unlock Document

Joanne Wood

Threats to Internal Validity What is internal validity? *did X cause Y? *Did changes in the predictor/independent variable cause the changes in the dependent variable? Threats to internal validity *things that jeopardize our ability to conclude that X caused Y *Things that jeopardize our ability to draw conclusions abt causality *Things other than the predictor variable that may had lead to effect *A factor other than X that may have caused Y Correlational Designs *Especially susceptible to threats to internal validity *Two issues in correlational designs that threaten validity: -3 variable and temporal order Types of correlational designs *Typical correlational design: use continuous measures to measure both the predictor and dependent variables *Continuous – ranked order from low to high *Categoral – discrete categories were talked abt Correlational Designs *Typically, continuous measures used for both the predictor and dependent variables. *Two new types of correlational designs *One group pre-test post-test design – pre test- exposed to x- get a pre-test - examine single group *Static groups design – compare two groups, one group gets the x, one grou has not *Two different ways of looking for the effects of X *Static groups design *Compare two groups— *One that has the X *One that has not *If difference between them, is it the X? *One group pre-test post-test design *Examine single group *Before an X occurs and after an X occurs *Is difference from before to after due to X? *Want to conclude that the difference from before to after is due to X *But could it be something other than X? (threats to internal validity) *Two ways of making comparison – 1. looking the same group before gettiong the x, one *(better than loooking only at yes/yes cell – no comparison there) Threats to internal validity *Both of these designs have their own threats to internal validity. *Both correlational designs no manipulation *Today we will focus on threats that apply to the one group pre-test post-test design Example of OGPTPT design The Globe and Mail, June 25, 2001 BRAIN FOOD “In one large-scale analysis of approximately one million students enrolled in the New York City school system,” reports Psychology Today, “researchers examined IQ scores before and after preservatives, dyes, colourings, and artificial flavours were removed from cafeteria lunch offerings. They found a 14 percent improvement after the removal. And the improvement was greatest for the weakest students.” *PV: chemicals on the food IV:IQ scores BRAIN FOOD How requirements addresed in OGPTPT design? *Covariation -before A, B lower -As A changed, B changes 2. Temporal Order (check) 3. Uniqeness *School learning (third variable) Or was it… *maturation *history *testing *Instrumentation *mortality *regression to the mean BRAIN FOOD Maturation- would participants have changed anyway? *Some way in which participants changed internally over time *Growing older *Growing wiser *Getting more knowledgeable *Getting bored *Tired *Hungry Or was it… *History – could some other external event happened to T1 and T2? History *Some external event that occurred in the time frame? *Something other than the X? *Examples? Maybe thwir classes? Maybe a new enrichment program? Could it be something abt the measure? *Did the measure itself change overtime? Or was it… *Testing – Did people change bec
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 291

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.