Class Notes (839,092)
Canada (511,185)
Psychology (2,075)
PSYCH 356 (23)
Lecture

PSYCH 356-001: Lecture #21

5 Pages
63 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYCH 356
Professor
Richard Eibach

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
PSYCH 356-001: LECTURE #21 Wednesday, July 24 , 2013  Psychopaths / Sociopath o Interesting set of symptoms that are recognized distinctively in therapeutic settings o Symptoms and set of characters seems to go along together but the reason for this is uncertain. o Impressionistic in character Are there high functioning psychopaths?  Not all psychopathic personalities wound up to be criminals  need to have a broader conception of the phenomenon compared to the ones that are portrayed in the media  Abnormalities in the behaviour Insights into psychopathy from language use  Using expressions of language to describe variability of traits and personality  14 psychopathic and 38 non-psychopathic criminals convicted of homicide were interviewed and asked to describe their crimes o Control Group  the non psychopathic criminals o Psychopathic symptoms rated by prison psychologists included superficial charm, lack of remorse, pathological lying  Noted characteristic symptoms that are setting apart psychopaths from the non psychopathic criminals  Interviewed them and recorded their personal narratives of the crime committed  Recorded the types of language used to narrate the crimes  Word use patterns in autobiographical crime narratives were analyzed for themes related to need- satisfaction, emotional detachment, and justifying language (e.g., “because,” “in order to”) o Suggesting that these crimes permitted were means to end o Psychopaths when they commit murders  seems to be due to trivial needs  use individual lives to meet their needs and ends  Emotional disturbances  lower affect  detach themselves emotionally (less emotional involvement in their descriptions of their crimes)  Should be more likely to link the murder to an end therefore using “justifying language” o Non-psychopathic murders  low level means as motivations to commit their crimes  crimes motivated by higher levels of motives such as social, etc.  Results: o As they predicted psychopaths were significantly more likely to express low levels of physiological and safety needs as motivations for killing others compared to the control participants. o Psychopaths in the description of their crimes were more likely to express social needs such as family and religion o Psychopaths were more likely to use past tense references compared to the non- psychopaths  Less likely to use present tense compared to the controls  One suggestion that they were more remote from these crimes  indicator of emotional detachment  More frequent use of articles  Sign of distancing and tendency to look at things in an analytical way  suggestive of a pattern of emotional detachment o Psychopaths frequent use of justifying language  Subordinating conjunctives  think in terms of these causal terms  needs to ends  Indicators of callousness and lack of empathy  More likely to exhibit speech disfluencies  Monitoring things they say  Not engaged in an immerse engaged types of conversation context A self-regulation perspective  Social cognitive factors playing in the role of personality expression dynamics  Goals  Personal goals and social goals o Tools or adaptations that are used to help in self-regulation in adaptive social functional ways  Example: Relate to others in order to minimize conflict in the group  It’s adaptive to do unnecessary harm to others  adaptive value of remaining in a group will deteriorate if everyone is against one another  Recognize Careful monitor distress cues in order to avoid causing distress to others  Personal emotional aversion of cues of distress of others should be distressing to the self  The ability to anticipate and empathize with another’s distress inhibits individuals against intentionally inflicting harm on others  Psychopaths may have a deficit in empathy skills that disinhibits them from harming others o Lack emotional aversion of other signs of emotional distress Problem: the psychopath paradox - Psychopaths are often characterized as charming and successful manipulators - Yet, also characterized as lacking empathy o Conflict the characterization as a “superficial charming” personality - How do they manage to manipulate others if they lack empathy? Differentiating cognitive and emotional empathy - Cognitive empathy (e.g., cold empathy) refers to a person’s ability to accurately infer others’ thoughts and feelings - Emotional empathy (e.g., hot empathy) refers to a person’s capacity to respond appropriately to another person’s emotional state o At a cognitive level, recognize that a person is sad. However, you would not feel sad  match their sadness (ability to emotionally empathize the other person’s feelings) - Hypothesis: Psychopaths may have normal ability to recognize others’ thoughts and feelings, which allows them to predict and manipulate others. However, they may have a deficit in generating appropriate emotional responses to others’ states. In particular, they may have a deficit in generating sympathetic emotional responses to cues of others’ distress. o Reduced empathic stress response  decreased aversion to signs of stress and response Cognitive empathy: reading the mind in the eyes - Usually studied at early developmental stages - Autism or Aspergers spectrum design tasks in order to identify or diagnose symptoms of autism or aspergers. - Test works by: o Person exhibiting a specific emotion or mental thought  look at the eyes of the person and try to guess the thought process of the person - There was no significant difference from the performance of psychopaths and non-psychopaths in the ability to read the mind in the eyes. o Psychopaths have an intact ability of cognitive empathy o Psychopaths can guess better than the average person of guessing the mental thought processes of people. Testing Emotional Empathy - Physiological arousal (Skin-conductance responses) were monitored as a sample of psychopathic and non-psychopathic male prisoners were exposed to a series of colour slides showing one of three types of images: people in distress, threatening images, and neutral images - Prediction: psychopaths would show normal levels of arousal to the threatening images and neutral images (as compared to the non-psychopaths  no difference in the levels of arousal) however, psychopaths should show less emotional arousal to people in distress than non- ps
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit