Class Notes (838,347)
Canada (510,861)
History (317)
HIST 103 (127)
Lecture

Reading Response W10 HIS 103.docx

3 Pages
62 Views
Unlock Document

Department
History
Course
HIST 103
Professor
Jeffrey Byrne
Semester
Winter

Description
Nurul Hanisah Kamarul Zaman (18499129) Week 10 HIST 103 101 War is Not the Only Key to a Nation’s Stability After World War I broke in 1921, the participating nations learned the truth from a hard way; the fact that war is not the panacea for economic instability. The period between 1921 to 1941 witnessed a number of events that had global impacts to the economy with the Great Depression being one of them. Motivated by the economic factors and the losses incurred during WWI, these factors are arguably Neville Chamberlain’s reasons for choosing to make the policy of appeasement during the Munich Conference in 1938. Chamberlain’s approach in dealing with foreign relations was understandably pragmatic. If the British were to wage another war with the Germans, they will certainly be at disadvantage since Britain was still in the process to recover its economy back to the pre-WWI state. From an economic perspective, the opportunity cost lost will be higher if the British anticipated another war. Increasing government spending to support the military mission was not the solution to help Britain’s to regain its economic position in the global market. Chamberlain’s approach resonates with John M. Keynes’view that asserts the need for the nations to help the losing countries to stabilize their economic situation. By doing so, this will help the losing countries to increase its production. The net result can be seen from the trade market among different countries resulting from the production. This inter-dependency is important as it helps countries to be able to meet their domestic demands besides generating income for them by trading. In conclusion, the strategy implemented by Chamberlain might have been criticized as it seems to show Britain as a weak country. However, his approach aims to benefit the British in the long run whereby the effect is not immediate. To reiterate, for a nation to prosper, it is not necessary for them to wage wars against each other and WWI is a foolproof evidence of this notion. Nurul Hanisah Kamarul Zaman (18499129) Week 10 HIST 103 101 - What motivates Chamberlain to seek an agreement with Hitler in 1938? How might the First World War have influenced his thoughts?  It is believed that Chamberlain’s decision to seek agreement with Hitler in 1938 was resulted from the casualties caused in World War I.  The victors and losers alike had to face a great deal of the post-WWI effect.  Preventing another form of war seems to be rational/legit reason for Neville Chamberlain to make policy that is seen as weak for some other people.  In fact, this is in line with Keynes’ view that the collective effort to rebuild the European’s economies is necessary.  By doing so, it will help the trade market and the net result will be the benefits gained from the trade. - Compare Japan’s ambition in the 1930s with those of the European colonial powers - in what ways is right-wing Japanese expansio
More Less

Related notes for HIST 103

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit