Class Notes (834,804)
Canada (508,727)
Philosophy (203)
PHIL 120 (20)
Lecture 2

Re-read Week 2 Notes.docx

9 Pages
141 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 120
Professor
Leslie Burkholder
Semester
Summer

Description
Re-read Week 2: Chapter 6, Section 1,3 What are the criteria for strong 1) Deductively valid arguments argument? Suspicion: this is the true and - Linking between premises and conclusion is very strong true case - Conclusion is, for sure, going to follow from the premises - Therefore, premises and conclusion should be true/accepted - The only case is that, not all deductively valid arguments are strong arguments Suspicion: this is 2) the true and false Deductively Invalid arguments case - So, whenever the The conclusion doesn’t necessarily follow from the premises conclusion is false; - it is deductively Argument (Conclusion) can be rejected eventhough the premises invalid argument are true 3) Inductively valid argument - Argument in which the premises make the conclusion likely - The links between premises and conclusion are tentative - Could be strong argument - E.g: believe in witness because they have been reliable in the past. But the conclusion that we should trust the witness is not necessarily accepted because the witness could be bribed.
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 120

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit