Class Notes (808,652)
Canada (493,325)
POLI 260 (62)

Poli 260 Lecture/Textbook Notes

32 Pages
Unlock Document

University of British Columbia
Political Science
POLI 260
Robert Farkasch

June 2011 Jessica Giang Themes May 9 2011 - Democracy Right of the community to protect over individual rights, or individual rights above all? - Look at geopolitics (the area, the structure of the system, does libya have nukes?), the elites, the ruling party, the history of the country. - Shift of power to the East, particularly India and China. - Continuity and change how much have things really changed? How will this shape the world in the next few years (how do political and economical themes coalesce to create certain outcomes?) - Conict and cooperation do countries act friendly or hostile toward another on a certain issue? - Explain political outcomes in international peacekeeping and the international political economy Denition of international relations - IR: interest in political patterns encompassing the world, not just between states but between multinational corporations (MNCs), NGOs, IGOs, etc. The process of increasing interconnectedness between societies such that events in one part of the world - are having increasing effects on peoples and societies far away sounds a lot like globalization - Globalization has caused traditional states to lose authority to supranational institutions like the IMF and EU. Liberal democratic values are becoming the global values. - Some people dispute this, saying todays economies are not more integrated than before WWI and that were not heading into a single world free trade zone but becoming more divided. The collective goods problem How to override individual self-interests to obtain a shared goal, or how to provide something that benets everyone regardless of what each member contributes to it. - Hard because each nation is sovereign w/its own free will, no world govt to force things. 3 possible solutions: force your will upon others, rewards & punishment, or self-sacrice to benet group 1) Dominance: create a hierarchy, gain power through actual or implied use of violence (fear). Provides order, stability, and predictability, but can cause oppression and resentment (and war if a ght for the top emerges). Overall not effective way to rule, too many resources are being used. 2) Reciprocity: set the agenda. Reward good behaviour punish those who pursue self-interest at the expense of the group. Does not need central authority, but you scratch my back and Ill scratch yours also means eye for an eye. Can lead to downward spiral as countries punish each other war. - i.e. IMF is controlled by the states that contribute the most money. These states can enforce their own ideas and systems onto countries who need their loans to get this $ $, you must give certain freedoms, have `elections, etc. More effective over rst way 3) Identity: instill certain ideas into the young/preventing the young from educating themselves about certain issues. People in an identity community care about the interests of others in the group enough to sacrice their own interests to benet others (because the benets are all in the family). Actors and inuences in IR States: govt who presides over popn in a territorial boundary. Has sovereignty, monopoly over force, doesnt answer to others. If popn shares a group identity, it may consider itself a nation. International system: the relationships among the worlds states, structured by explicit and implicit rules. Looks at rights and roles that states have, who is considered a state, how to treat each other. Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs): groups consisting of a few or more states. I.e. OPEC, WTO, NATO. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs): private organizations usually w/political or humanitarian purpose. June 2011 Jessica Giang Multinational corporations (MNCs): companies that span multiple countries. Depends on the state to provide protection, welll-regulated markets, stable political environment, etc. I.e. Walmart. What is theory? Max Weber: All knowledge of cultural reality is always knowledge from particular points of view. - - Why do we do the things we do? Why is society organized a certain way (drive on the left/right)? Why do we have more hybrids while Europeans have more diesel? What interests are pushing this particular behaviour? Look at power & biases. - Diamonds are not scarce, but are monopolized. Company creates image associate diamonds with celebrities, royalty, needed for marriage. - Our ideas are shaped by a particular doctrine, image of the world, ideology, paradigm, or prospective - Theory - a simplifying device that allows you to decide which facts matter and which do not - People wear different sunglasses to view the same world with (their biases, what theyre narrowing down in terms of their focus). People with green glasses see the world differently than people with blue or yellow or red glasses. - Empirical theory subject to test against real-world data or facts, prediction for observed phenomena. - Clear division between facts and values. Looks at what is. CHALLENGE ideas - Normative theories deals with values and value preferences philosophy - Not subject to empirical test as a means of establishing their truth or falsehood - I.e. Do we always go to war because humans are inherently evil? You cannot give empirical evidence for this, it depends on your values and preferences what do you believe? - Emphasize what ought to be and not just what is i.e. In Thailand, boys go to school more than girls. But I think this is wrong, we need to look at why more boys are being educated than girls. -Focus on not accepting the situation as it is, focus on ways to change it. - Theory is always for someone & some purpose. All theories have a perspective (attitude, certain outlook). I.e. Whats the states interest in doing something? Theory can serve 2 distinct purposes: 1) To help solve problems within the terms of a particular perspective/outlook (immediate action to the situation that youre in) 2) To reect upon the process of theorizing itself (how come this situation is happening, why did we respond in this way and not another way): a) aware of the perspective behind theorizing think about the ideas behind the actions b) relationship of a perspective to other perspectives realism to liberalism c) become aware of how different perspectives create different worlds e.g. Realism vs idealism Problem solving theory: takes the world as it nds it, deals with particular sources of trouble (i.e. With the nuclear crisis in Japan, you deal with cooling down the reactors instead of thinking about how to rely less on nuclear energy). Thinks about planned actions to sustain the existing order, to keep things as they are. Strength: ability to x parameters, limit variables. Critical theory: looks at the prevailing order of the world and asks how that order came about. Calls social institutions into question, possibility of change. Thinks about strategies and actions to bring about an alternate order, to change (i.e. What alternatives are there to nuclear energy?) Levels of analysis Possible explanations of international events or Why questions. Levels of analysis may include: 1) The (interstate/systemic) international system looks at distribution of power among states, their power relative to another state (military how do countries with small armies win against large armies; June 2011 Jessica Giang economic; cultural - Japan & Germany in WWII were decimated, but by the 1970s were powerful again), geography, technology, and other factors. 2) The (domestic) state and society is the state democratic? Authoritarian? Economic, military actors. Looks at interest groups involved in politics (lobbyists). How do these groups affect their states actions? 3) The choices, perceptions, and actions of individuals Obama and Harper. They are drivers of international policy, but theyre just one part. For example, why does war occur? 1) Is it because of the nature of individuals (are humans innately aggressive)? 2) Is it because of the nature of states & societies (are some types of states more aggressive than others)? 3) Is it because of the nature of the international system of states (balance of power, instability means more likely chance of war, fear peoples whose powers are declining rather than those whose are rising)? Globalization - Whats so special about the current period? May 11 2011 Should not fully believe enlightenment idea that history is progressive. Not all things get better over time. Why were special: - Economic connectedness between distant countries when we call for services, we may end up talking to IT techs in India. Outsource jobs overseas, could be cheaper, save time for person who outsources, more efficient. Products come from all over the world to a greater degree than in the past. - Our notions of distance have changed, especially when communicating/receiving information & traveling. - World shares a common culture, the differences between people are diminishing - However, with an example like Mcdonalds and the issue of McDonaldization, one could argue that although McDonalds is all over the world now, each country puts their own cultural inuences into McDonalds. Also, is it such a bad thing? In Russia, McDonalds workers were trained to serve with a smile. In other places, McDonalds meant a clean washroom (in a time of incredibly dirty public washrooms). In China, people had to wait civilly in line. -
More Less

Related notes for POLI 260

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.