Class Notes (973,757)
CA (573,544)
UNB (369)
ADM (8)
ADM3123 (4)

chapter 7

by OneClass222997 , Winter 2014
4 Pages
Winter 2014

Administration - UNBF
Course Code
Robert Derra

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Chapter 7: the terms of a contract
I. The content of a contract
Terms: contractual terms can be expressed or implied.
oExpress terms: a provision of a contract that states a promise explicitly
(Ex: price, quantity, warranties…)
oJudicial interpretation of express terms:
Vague or ambiguous language: any vague or ambiguous wording
or language from the drafter will be construed against that party in
favor of the other party.
In case the language is too ambiguous to understand, the
contract will not be enforceable.
Rules of construction: guiding principles for interpreting
or “constructing” the terms of a contract.
oThese principles often conflict. (Ex: plain-
meaning rule vs. parties intention) Its impossible
to predict the judges decision.
Implied term: a provision that is not expressly included in
a contract but that is necessary to give effect to the parties
intention (a judges will put these terms in if hes satisfied
that not all of the terms the parties intend to include are
actually included in the contract)
oBusiness efficacy: a judge is entitled to imply terms
necessary to make the contract workable.
oCustoms in the trade of the transaction: relying
on trade custom to imply a term is rarely successful
since it must be proved that the custom is so
notorious that the contract must be assumed to
imply it.
oPrevious dealings between the parties: if parties
have contracted in the past, it may be possible to
imply that their current contract contains the same
oStatutory requirements: certain terms are a
mandatory part of every contract for the sale of
goods unless specifically excluded by the parties
(sales of goods act)
In general, it’s not easy to imply a term except in
routine transactions or unless the sale of goods
act applies, or both parties are clear in their
intentions to put the terms in.
oContractual quantum meruit: awarding one party
a reasonable sum for the goods or services provided
under a contract.

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Chapter 7: the terms of a contract I. The content of a contract  Terms: contractual terms can be expressed or implied. o Express terms: a provision of a contract that states a promise explicitly  (Ex: price, quantity, warranties…) o Judicial interpretation of express terms:   Vague or ambiguous language: any vague or ambiguous wording  or language from the drafter will be construed against that party in  favor of the other party. • In case the language is too ambiguous to understand, the  contract will not be enforceable. • Rules of construction: guiding principles for interpreting  or “constructing” the terms of a contract.  o These principles often conflict. (Ex: plain­ meaning rule vs. parties’ intention) It’s impossible  to predict the judges’ decision. • Implied term: a provision that is not expressly included in  a contract but that is necessary to give effect to the parties’  intention (a judges will put these terms in if he’s satisfied  that not all of the terms the parties intend to include are  actually included in the contract) o Business efficacy: a judge is entitled to imply terms  necessary to make the contract workable. o Customs in the trade of the transaction: relying  on trade custom to imply a term is rarely successful  since it must be proved that the custom is so  notorious that the contract must be assumed to  imply it. o Previous dealings between the parties: if parties  have contracted in the past, it may be possible to  imply that their current contract contains the same  terms. o Statutory requirements: certain terms are a  mandatory part of every contract for the sale of  goods unless specifically excluded by the parties  (sales of goods act)  ▯In general, it’s not easy to imply a term  except in  routine transactions or unless the sale of goods  act applies, or both parties are clear in their  intentions to put the terms in. o Contractual quantum meruit: awarding one party  a reasonable sum for the goods or services provided  under a contract.  The Parol evidence rule: a rule that limits the outside evidence a party can  introduce concerning the contents of the contract. o This rule forbids any evidence outside of a contract when the contract is  clearly written  ▯parties should be careful with any oral contracts, as they  may not be enforced by the court. o Reinforced by the entire contract clause o However, there are still cases where outside evidence is important:  There was a fraud in the formation of the contract.  When the contract was actually intended to be partly oral and  partly written.  If the promise is contained in a collateral agreement, which itself  happens to be oral • Collateral agreement: an independent side contract which  has terms that conflict with the main contract.  When the language is too ambiguous. II. Using contractual terms to manage risk.  Change circumstances: parties should put contractual terms that protect them in  unexpected events. (Ex: instead of having a fixed price, negotiate a price to be  based on current economic stand)  Conditional agreement: are essential when one party wants to incur contractual  obligations but only under certain circumstances (Ex: an offeree agrees to buy the  house only if he can get a mortgage from the bank) o Given there is a contract between parties, the law provides two  mechanism/terms to bind a party from breaching the contract during the  time set aside for the condition’s fulfillment:  Condition subsequent: an event or circumstance that, when it  occurs, brings and existing contract to an end. (Ex: an employee’s  salary is guaranteed if he does a good job. If he does not, he is  immediately fired)  Condition precedent: an event or circumstance that, until it  occurs, suspends the parties’ obligations to perform their  contractual obligations (Ex: the mortgage example. The house  owner must wait during a certain period of time f
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

You've reached the limit of 4 previews this month

Create an account for unlimited previews.

Already have an account?

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.