Class Notes (836,812)
Canada (509,909)
Philosophy (1,795)
PHI2183 (60)
Lecture

L17 - Communitarianism I
Premium

3 Pages
60 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHI2183
Professor
Daniel Kofman
Semester
Winter

Description
March 25, 2014 Recap libertarian-egalitarian debate ** Communitarianism • Incommensurability - claim that there are different goods or values which can’t be measured on a single scare (in principle) so you don’t know how to compare Objections to Robert Nozick’s libertarianism: 1.1 People are supposed to have fundamental rights of liberty, which act as “side constraints” 1.2 These are supposed to be equal rights (your right to liberty is as absolute as mine 1.3 But people do not have equal liberty unless they have equal opportunity. 1.4 Equal opportunity requires some degree of equal resources. (There are different ways to bring about equal opportunity ...). It may also require limiting inheritance or the right to bequeath. -however rich people can purchase goods that poor people cannot -Should there be redistribution? RIGHT TO EQUAL LIBERTY > what he bases his argument on Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld -most important is a claim right -first order rights - constitutional immunities protect first order rights ... We have rights not to have our first order rights changed by government 1.5 So some redistribution for the sake of justice is justified 2. Capitalist markets are not “natural” and “free” 2.1 Capitalist markets are not natural but require an extensive legal framework, including that which creates and gives legal “personality” and “rights” to corporations 2.2 If inequalities arise from an artificial legal framework, it is not a violation of property rights to limit those inequalities though redistributive taxation. 3. Marriage example Marriage between consenting adults should not be interfered with because of the nature of love and marriage: autonomy should be respected - But how much money one has does not require the same respect. Communitarianism 1. Two main categories of claims: 1.1 a socio-metaphysical claim about from where people get their identities, purposes, goals, values and thus their “conceptions of the good”, and also their judgments about what justice requires (Sandel, Taylor, MacIntyre) Another such claim: Walzer: different goods have different “spheres” (princi
More Less

Related notes for PHI2183

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit