Class Notes (837,694)
Canada (510,398)
Philosophy (1,795)
PHI2183 (60)
Lecture

L19 - Libertarianism
Premium

4 Pages
100 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHI2183
Professor
Daniel Kofman
Semester
Winter

Description
April 1, 2014 • Liberalism treats liberty as a central value • Political restrictions on liberty (laws) must be justified by those who wish to put in place such laws o Critics (communitarians, perfectionists, and intuitionists) - it overemphasis liberty at the expense of other values o Liberal ideology is itself fractured • Political obligation < (duty to obey the laws) is a problem for liberalism. The state’s laws are coercive. Freedom and autonomy conflict with coercion • Coercion implies the interference of other human beings upon your liberty • Negative Liberty: liberty is the absence of interferences • Positive Liberty: autonomy based liberty (freedom) • Republican Liberty: liberty-protecting government ensures that no agent, including itself, has arbitrary power over citizens – equal disbursement of power -the mere possibility of interference is seen as a limitation on liberty • Classic liberalism – private property and individual liberty are directly intertwined -people are free to negotiate contracts and sell their labor as they see fit -private property is the only effective means of protecting liberty - Contract tradition tries to make authority/legitimacy depend on consent. - Rousseau adds identification with laws - pre-political unanimity - Positive liberty; should be called liberty, wanted to restrict to negative liberty. Positive liberty is seen as coercion. - positive freedom is when you divide the self into two or more different parts - like Plato had - 3 parts - general will, empirical self, real self 3. For some, democracy is the solution to the puzzle - no obligation to obey laws of a dictatorship, but in democracy people rule so not a problem. - for some democracy, there is no solution: the fact that the state is democratic, doesn’t resolve the issue 3.1 Premise: individuals are free, autonomous (moral claim - right) 3.2 Premise: since individuals are free and autonomous (self-legislating), they should not be coerced (unless they threaten someone else’s equal freedom). 3.3 Premise: States, by definition, rule by coercion 3.4 People have right (and moral duty) to exercise their own autonomy 3.4 Conclusion (1-4): Therefore individuals do not have duties to obey states, and all state authority is illegitimate 3.5 Premise: majority rule democracies coerce minorities 3.6: Conclusion: (from 4-5) Individuals (in a minority) do not have duties to obey democratic majorities, or the laws of democratic states 4. Robert Paul Wolff, inventor of the doctrine of ‘philosophical anarchism’, makes these points together: 4.1 individuals have basic rights to autonomy 4.2 One may not forfeit one’s moral autonomy: it is inalienable. (Liberal tradition: one cannot sell oneself into slavery). 4.3 Just as promising to be a slave cannot (morally) make you a slave, promising to obey the laws of a
More Less

Related notes for PHI2183

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit