Class Notes (835,629)
Canada (509,297)
Philosophy (1,795)
PHI3170 (20)
Lecture

Lecture 2
Premium

3 Pages
106 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHI3170
Professor
Daniel Kofman
Semester
Fall

Description
Sept. 10, 2013 General Intro: Descartes’ Epistemology  How do we determine knowledge? (reliability, can be taken seriously) 1. Descartes’ epistemological project moves to the center of philosophy 1.1 – Plato’s Meno (p. 32)  Having a correct opinion about knowledge makes a good guide  Socrates: Right opinion is no less useful than knowledge?  Meno: A man of knowledge will always be successful, whereas a man of opinion, only sometimes.  Socrates: ….  The beliefs don’t run away, they’re tied down.  Someone with knowledge is able to give an account for the beliefs that they have.  In posing questions about beliefs, one can determine whether these beliefs are substantiated, or whether they “run away.” 2. Why does Descartes insist on indubitability as a condition for knowledge? 2.1 – The influence of mathematics  Descartes will not accept the formal logic of mathematics as indubitable  Does 2+2=4?  There must be some premise we hold to be true off of which we can build further truths  Establish knowledge claims which are stable, lasting, and off of which to build the sciences  Requires a high standard of truth  The evolution of scientific knowledge  scientific beliefs being overturned ex: Einstein theory of relativity overturned Newton’s theory ex: Quantum physics overturned assumptions made in the classical mechanical sciences  Are the sciences really indubitable?  What makes a scientific theory credible – the scientific method (experiment or phenomena can be reproduced under similar conditions with similar observations).  Descartes will insist on indubitability as a requirement for knowledge 2.2 – The search for truth  What makes a true belief knowledge?  What conditions are required to determine true belief? 2.3 – Possible further conditions: 2.3.1 – Higher order (Kap  KaKap) 2.3.2 – Nozickean subjectivism: Knowledge ‘tracks’ truth. If I know that I know that p If I know that I know that Bap Were it the case that p [ ]  A would believe p Were it the case that not p [ ]  A would not believe p  Descartes wants to track his beliefs, indubitability will ensure that it tracks in truth. 2.4 – Found vs. Coherence, Fallibility of belief combined with foundational premise threaten all knowledge.  The relationship between beliefs  How our beliefs hang together  Foundationalism: the belief that we have some basic beliefs that have some special epistemic status in our belief system, and from them, we
More Less

Related notes for PHI3170

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit