Class Notes (808,648)
Philosophy (1,713)
PHI3170 (20)
Lecture 6

# Lecture 6 Premium

3 Pages
81 Views

School
University of Ottawa
Department
Philosophy
Course
PHI3170
Professor
Daniel Kofman
Semester
Fall

Description
Sept. 24, 2013 Attempts to answer Gettier: causal theory, relevant alternatives -Gettier’s counterexample is based on sufficient conditions JTB (justified true belief) Recap: The structure of GCEs (Gettier’s Counter Examples): i. S justifiably believes P ii. - P (P is false) (So S justifiably believes a false premise). Assumption: internal justification fallible iii. (P  Q) – P is sufficient for Q, but not necessary for P iv. Q (happens to be true, ‘luckily’ i.e. not in virtue of following from P; recall: iii does not say P is necessary for Q; something else may produce Q while P is false). ex: P P  Q Therefore, Q v. S (validly) infers Q from P vi. S justifiably believes Q and Q is true, but S does not know Q 1. How to cook up a GCE in 3 easy steps: 1.1 - Take an ordinarily justified belief say on basis of ordinary perception, normally reliable testimony, general background knowledge. 1.2 - Invent circumstances in which the ordinary justification this time fails: trick, deception, optical illusion, usually reliable sources is lying or mistaken, etc. (Zagzebski’s 1 accident) 1.3 - Note: S now has false belief. Do NOT serve this up as a CGE or your dinner guests will choke. Further preparation, treat this false belief as a lemma, and invent an nd inference from it to something that happens to be true (Zagzebski’s 2 accident). Note: Easiest (and most banal) way to do 1.3 is Gettier’s own: law of addition: Disjoin statement that turns out true by chance to the false belief of 1.2. This is a GCE with a false lemma. Trickier exercise: make a Feldman-style GCE with no false lemma. Homework: come up with a Gettier example EXAMPLE: I believe there is a deer in the field. But what I take to be a deer is in fact a tree. However, my belief is valid because there is a deer in the field, but I don’t see it because it’s behind the tree. Therefore JTB is justified but it does not constitute knowledge. What appears to be a window is really a TV screen relaying recorded images of the outside from a week ago. You look, and form the justified belief: ‘It is raining’. As a matter of fact this is also true. 2. Replies to Gettier generally take one of two forms: th 2.1 – Adding 4 condition to JTB 2.2
More Less

Related notes for PHI3170

OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Join to view

OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.