Class Notes (835,638)
Canada (509,305)
POL2103 (176)
Lecture

POL 2103 E - Intro to International Relations _ Global Politics - Joseph Roman - 03 Jan. 13.docx

6 Pages
121 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL2103
Professor
Mark Salter
Semester
Winter

Description
POL 2103 E - Intro to International Relations & Global Politics - Joseph Roman - 03 Jan. 13 Realism - Context for its development - Common themes and concepts - Causes of war - Role of science Realism vs. Idealism & the Inter-War Crisis - E.H. Carr’s The Twenty Years’Crisis reacts to the Paris Peace Conference - He thinks the people at the Conference were responsible for WW2, b/c they were idealists. They looking how the world ought to be, not what it actually is. - He says that Idealists forget about 1) the role of power in IR 2) the inherent inability of humans to be good all the time, & 3) states having unlike interests - Basically, a question of “what is” (realists) vs. “what ought to be” (idealists) The Hard Core of Realism - All types of realism share these assumptions 1) Statism - States are the only legit actors in international affairs which can represent the collective will, only actors that matter 2) Survival - Anarchy is inherent, there is no true order in IR, absence of central authority - Thus, you gotta look out for yourself, the state, it’s national interest 3) Self-help - Responsible for its own survival and well-being 4) Balance of power - Ex: StateAthreatened by B.A teams up with C, to balance power against B. 5) Realism as a predictive theory: interested in mostly Why do things happen? - Some realists also ask what do we do when they happen? 6) Modelling objective laws - Realism wants to make objective laws - Lending scientific credibility to realism 7) Parsimony - Wants simple explanations for large concepts - Wants to ignore side subjects (Ex: gender inequality) 8) Hobbesian epistemology - Their lonestar 9) States are the only actors that matter - back to ontology Classical Realism - Classical realism takes its cue from Thucydides’s History of the Peloponnesian War, which argues that humans have an 1) innate drive for power and a 2) will to dominate - Hans J. Morgenthau echoes this stance in Politics Among Nations, which is the essential classical realist statement - Accepting the innate drive for power and a will to dominate means understanding how the international system of states works Elements of Classical Realism - Power is an end in itself - States want to grab power precisely b/c it affords them security in a self-help - Power is psychological, i.e.Agets B to do what B would otherwise not want to do - Power is fungible (different types) - Asuccessful balance of power depends on the strength of international society The balance of power - The balance is a double-edged sword b/c it prevents & causes war - Status quo & revisionist states - Maybe a status quo state thinks a revisionist state has too much power, then boom, a war - Or maybe a revisionist state thinks the status quo state won’t get something done, war - Stability of the world depends on polarity, which determines the kind of system we live in - Soviets vs. US - Systems change when poles change - Today, mostly a uni-polar world - Hegemonic wars ignited when capabilities change - Hegemonic wars = great powers going to war - These wars are the basic cause for system changes - In addition to power, classical realists say: - material (science & tech, mostly to warfare) & - ideological transformations - can chart courses for the international system - Materially, science & technology can make war more destructive, thus lessening is likelihood - Nuclear weapons & mutually assured destruction (MAD) - Thou (?) says nuclear weapons are great, and made up MAD. B/c of MAD, you have assured peace. - Ideological transformations involve acceptable & unacceptable behaviour in the international system - Before, it was unthinkable for an empire to not have colonies. Nowadays, imperialism is unthinkable. Classical Realism and the National Interest - The national interest, i.e. raison d’etat, involves maximizing the interests of the state - The national interest eliminates morality in the international system - If a state acts moral, the state’s jeopardizing his national security - An anarchical system gives license to states to do what would people cannot - States that act morally will put the national interest at risk - Realpolitik - Yet, states have 1 moral duty: to protect the ethical political community which resides within its borders - There is a clear line between the international and domestic spheres for classical realists - In the domestic sphere, there’s a central authority as well as a common political culture. This is completely unlike the international sphere. - Therefore, domestically, norms can exist The Place of Justice for Classical Realists - Justice does serve 2 ends: 1) It helps others to see & act towards a state
More Less

Related notes for POL2103

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit