Class Notes (807,241)
Canada (492,664)
POL2108 (80)

POL 2108 A - Modern Political Thought I - Guy Côté - 03 Jan. 14.docx

2 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Ottawa
Political Science
Mark Salter

POL 2108 A- Modern Political Thought I - Guy Côté - 03 Jan. 14 Most philosophers think there’s a human nature, whether it is that we’re all good or bad. There is no single truth. Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) does not believe our human nature includes the desire to be happy, unlike the early Greek philosophers likeAristotle or Plato. To him, if you have an objective, any means to achieve said end is allowed. Morals have no relation. Unlike other philosophers, he does not focus on what the objective should be, but the means. He was very ambitious and wanted to be Prince Lorenzo de Medici’s advisor. He even wrote a book about how to achieve your goals to get the Prince’s attention. Basically, he talks about how to get from pointAto point B. To Machiavelli, B is a self-fulfillment of the state. To him, the more ancient a historical text is about politics, the more truthful it is. He is someone who wanted to restore the Roman Empire. The state can only fulfill itself if it became like the Roman Empire. He admired the concept of fear. He thought that fear was the most important. Citizens should be fearing the Empire, b/c if they fear the government, they’ll be more likely to listen. In fact, if the government tries to relate or be likeable to its citizens, it’ll be worse. The Prince should be feared, but not hated. This is then the problem that Machiavelli had with Democracy. Since parties are always trying to be elected, and this involves being nice and appealing to its citizens, the the parties are not doing what they should be doing, taking the proper decisions for the Republic (read below).APrince cannot make the right decisions if he keeps seeking love from his people. In the end, the Prince should be feared, not hated, but not loved either. If he was hated, then people would disobey him and perhaps instigate rebellion or leave. He couldn’t take his people’s property either or their women. He even has a whole theory on religion. Church makes the promotion of a vengeful God, in that if you don’t listen to him, you’ll be put in Hell. This fear keeps people obedient and keeps order. So politically, he wants to put a similar system in the state. He sees religion as a scheme to keep stability, order, and obedience. To him, religion is therefore the perfect example of an organization that does this. Similarly, he wants the state’s military to fear the state as well, so they’ll work for it better. For the Christians, God was love. For the Jews and o
More Less

Related notes for POL2108

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.