Class Notes (836,414)
Canada (509,777)
POL3115 (15)
Lecture 3

Lecture 3 - Introduction to the Comparative Method
Premium

5 Pages
99 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL3115
Professor
Modeste Mba Talla
Semester
Winter

Description
Jan. 23, 2014 Introduction to the Comparative Method: How do we compare? 1- Introduction  Questions and issues relating to what to compare, why we compare, and how to compare are the major concern of comparisons.  We study politics in several different ways: o First stage (descriptive): description - we describe it o Second stage (analytic): ability to predict based on an explanation – we seek to explain it and sometimes try to predict it 2- The Past in Comparative Politics  Historical evidence:Aristotle was the first comparativist twenty-five hundred years ago  The Greek Plato and Roman Cicero also used a comparative approach  Montesquieu (French vs. British), Machiavelli,Adam Smith, and Karl Marx (capitalism vs. Marxism)  In the nineteenth century: Best early studies –Alexis de Tocqueville (French- European vs.American) and James Bryce (British vs.American) -first 2 men to study public opinion as a modern concept  “Without comparisons to make, the mind does not know how to proceed” -Alexis de Tocqueville, 1945  he compared more countries/political systems  By the 1920s and 30s, comparative politics had developed as one of the major fields within political science Past comparative politics:  The comparative politics field was strongly influenced by refugees from Europe during the 1930s and 1940s  Until the 1950s, the main focus of comparative politics was the countries of Western Europe -more emphasis on the Western state, government, laws -Morgenthau  Comparative politics mainly studied the formal legal…  Merely descriptive rather than analytic (this shifts in the 50s)  Formalistic rather than concentrating on dynamic processes (something that actually changes) Ex: Globalization, Communism (collapse of the Soviet Union), the Black Market (difficult to analyze)  Too parochial (too simplistic – easy to predict), developmentalist (universal and irreversible) approach  There was little attention to more other aspects such as: -political parties (no attention) -the state (attention) -public opinion (no attention) -the opinion of the leaders (attention) -high politics (no attention)  Roy Macridis “The Study of Comparative Government” -move away from legal institutions -move away from the formal – difficulty understanding the complexity of the state  First away from old fashioned study of formal-legal institutions and toward more dynamic factors -Donald Rumsfeld – pay more attention to the public opinion (ex: war in Vietnam)  Second: away from the older focus on Europe and towards the Third World -independence of Third World countries -their role in comparative politics – new school of thought in political economy -Ex: development in Latin America – unfair economic circumstances  Non-parochial, non-formalistic, non-legalistic analytic  Functional approach to politics rather than an institutional one  The rise of the modern comparative politics: in the early to mid-1950s, a revolution occurred in the comparative politics field and in political science -more analytic 3- The Present in Comparative Politics  Two perspectives: 1- The traditional perspective – based on the variances (elements) that you can ‘easily control’– elements that are constant. Ex: borders, population, a country's resources, etc. 2- The modern perspective – based on variances that are difficult to control – something that is not constant. Ex: public opinion, immigration, regime, etc.  One of the sub-fields within the academic discipline of political science as well as an approach to the study of politics and development across countries. -Gender – previously, women belonged in low politics Ex: the mothers of Soviet Union soldiers who didn’t want them to go to war in Afghanistan. So the soldiers didn’t go and the Soviet Union slowly collapsed. Ex: women on the Plaza de Mayo -Argentina  As a field of study, comparative politics focuses on understanding and explaining political phenomena. -change in perspective  By drawing on the comparative method, comparative politics attempts to provide a systematic study of the world’s polities  Comparative politics draws a better understanding of how politics work (not as it is) as well as rules about politics – critical study of politics  McCormick refers to comparative polit
More Less

Related notes for POL3115

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit