Class Notes (834,986)
Canada (508,846)
Anthropology (2,022)
ANT363H5 (14)

ANT363 (Jan 30, 2013).docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

Todd Sanders

Doing - Doing o Opening the black box o Myers – protein crystallography o Rountree – neo-pagan pilgrimages o Conclusion - Knowledge can`t be extracted but is obtained from the outside of what scientists, witches or whoever is doing - Is science subjective? - Does science separate mind from body? Humans from non-humans? While magic confuses these things? Does magic muddles everything together? - Opening Pandora’s black box o Humans exist within history o The world that we born into matters because what we know is already predefined and given to us when we’re born; we don’t just pick up an idea and invent something o We don’t reinvestigate all knowledge and go back to step 1; we assume most of our world by what people have told us o This is how science and magic proceed, they don’t return to the origin and question and reprove everything; they just assume and continue on o This history shapes and makes the world the way it is; o All the garbage is thrown into the black box; we black box what we mostly know about the world; we don’t really know what’s in them, we just assume it’s true o Social sciences need to go reopening the black box and go about the messy procedure of understanding what makes knowledge o What are people doing to make the outcome appear? o Ready-made science (closed black box) such as the world is round o Science in the making is what is interesting - Ready-made science (outcome) o Just get your facts straight o Just get the most efficient machine o Once the machine works, people will be convinced o When things are true they hold - Science in the making (process) o Get rid of all the useless facts (stuff them into black boxes) o Decide on what efficiency should be o The machine will work when all the relevance people are convinced o When things hold, they start becoming true - Social scientists’ attention is turned to practice and what happened through time - Doing and producing knowledge through doing - Myers – protein crystallography o Doing field work in the university where she observed students o Complex 3D structures made of atoms o Protein crystallographers: build protein molecules using x-ray diffraction o No one can see protein molecules to see their true shape and form o Structures surmised by computers and human input algorithms o Used to make physical models; this practice is needed so to see how the protein works and the physical engagement with the model is necessary o Physical drawbacks: back and forth of what you think what might be there; slow and finicky thing to do because the models can break apart and hard to work with o Computer models is a new invention where you can build models and so you won’t have to deal with deteriorating models; but can’t physically engage with it o Eventually found a way to work by getting physical graphing station where they can manage using 3D images and manipulate it o Diffraction producing a scatter plot to create a picture; cryptic pictures; many combinations between different mapping techniques to attempt to get what the protein model looks like; mostly guess work; finished model is not the protein because you can’t see the actual protein to compare so it’s just the best estimate o Central point: require bodily engagement and jumping in the process of the scienti
More Less

Related notes for ANT363H5

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.