Class Notes (835,798)
Canada (509,410)
POL208Y5 (129)
Todd Hall (25)
Lecture

Oct. 1 - Levels of Analysis; Realist Views.docx

6 Pages
103 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POL208Y5
Professor
Todd Hall
Semester
Fall

Description
Oct. 1 - Levels of Analysis; Realist Views The Third Image Systematic Theory in IR - Patterns of outcomes as shaped by the structure of the system - Patterns of overall system - E.g. a capitalist system = creates incentives for companies to meet demands but companies who produce items that do not meet popular culture goes out of business o Pattern is companies going out of business (i.e. Apple makes Blackberry suffers) - State-run enterprises = supply not meeting demand The Third Image - Which systems are more prone to being stable What type of system? Anarchy - Basic = what makes up international system = ANARCHY = NO GOVERNMENT - Lack of a government - Idea: International system does not have overarching power that can enforce its will on other states “The State of Nature” – Thomas Hobbes o Lacking a central power => state of nature = situation where men live without securities o In these conditions, live in fear and solidarity that is brutal o Notion: reply upon one’s own strength o Leviathan  Government that forms this power that can instill order into chaos o Discovered this is true for the domestic system The International Level? - States can defend their own borders and territory = no central power to tell it what to do Hierarchy vs. Anarchy - Domestic realm where there is control = hierarchy - World of relations between states = state of war => constant struggle to protect themselves, maintain sovereignty What about the U.N? - Would organization but its members are states - Has no army of its own - Reliant upon agreement of states to enforce any resolutions it makes = if can make o Dependent on will of states - Not exactly a central government Theory of International Politics - Kenneth Waltz - Moved realist views of “human nature” to systematic theories o States seek survival o Uncertainty about the future o Self-help world o Need to balance o Elimination of those that fail to balance Balancing - States act, build up their power against other states - i.e. State A build up nuclear weapons, State B does the same = arms race o Look at the Cold war o India and Pakistan - Internal Balancing o Building up own state’s strength o Investing in weapons, technology, increasing armory - External Balancing o E.g. Truman signing North Atlantic Treaty o Combining with other states, relying on other states, combining power against opposing state o Creating alliances to protect oneself Waltz’s World o States seek survival o Uncertainty about the future o Self-help world o Need to balance o Elimination of those that fail to balance - Natural tendency where if states who do not balance, get eliminated Waltz’s Theory - System of levels to analyze International System Ordering Principle: Anarchy Character of Units: Similar Distribution of Capabilities: Variable Capabilities - Population - Territory - Resources - Economic capability - Military strength - Political stability and competence  All have to do with material = what states possess  What matters is distribution across states => seems domestic  Distribution relative to concentration across the system  This is comparison across states o Only has a functioning government as compared to another state o Only has more weapons if compared to another Pole: - (1) commands an especially large share of the resources or capabilities states can use to achieve their ends and that - (2) excels in all the component elements of state capability, conventionally defined as size of the population and territory resource endowment, economic capacity, military might and organizational institutional “competence”  What determines what a system looks like is how many poles it has Three Distinctions of Polariity - Prevalence of war depends on what type of system there is Multipolarity - Multiple states - This is peaceful = one strong state, other states align to keep the balance = makes sure system keeps stable - E.g. European Multipolarity o Never one power strong enough to overcome another o Reserved independence of states o Role of balancer: British => lend power to weaker states create equilibrium  “Heav’n that has plac’d this island to give law, To balance Europe and her states in awe” - Idea that balance of power reserves stability amongst states - Balance of Power under a Multipolar System – Stable? o Problems with multipolarity argued by Waltz  Possibility of free riders  Alignments uncertain  Possibility for miscalculation higher o In the international system, balance of power can fail if they let one state take the burden of all the responsibility o Balances can also fail if alignments are uncertain o E.g. WWI – alliance system – Germans + Austria + Italy  Secret treaties, agreements, questionable allies  Therefore, miscalculations o MULTIPOLAR SYSTEM IS UNSTABLE, more likely to fall in war since unsure of aliiances Bipolarity - Two, relatively large states creating a bipolar - Do not have to worry about alliances - Do not have to worry about states free riding - Original view: bipolarity unstable because relied too much on one state’s internal balance of power o Waltz argued against this o His value of bipolarity:  Less uncertainty  More caution
More Less

Related notes for POL208Y5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit