Class Notes (835,600)
Canada (509,275)
Sociology (4,077)
SOC205H5 (139)
Lecture

Lecture 3

4 Pages
74 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology
Course
SOC205H5
Professor
Zachary Levinsky
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 3- January 23, 2013 Why do people commit crime?  Social context taken into account  Biological/psychological theories; issues reside within the individual (genetic predisposition) Durkheim  How criminology shifts over time related to what’s going on in historical period  Wrote about suicide and why people commit suicide (1897)  How does society maintain order? (especially in time of transition/rapid change [i.e. turn of the century, industrial revolution]) o A continuum- mechanical solidarity (more primitive societies); no real institutions are around and may be organized by tribes, little/no division of labour o Organic solidarity- somehow all societies evolve into this; more complex modern society (natural progression of all societies as they become more organized); characterized by division of labour (people have certain function in society)  When fully developed into organic solidarity, order will be achieved in society (society as some kind of unfolding process)  During this transition period when anomie exists (times of “normlessness”); people not sure how to act because it is rapidly changing  Punishment serves as useful function- reinforces collective conscience/moral order and productive in that sense (highlights values, norms and morals of society)  Crime normal and necessary- helps healthy society  Structural functionalist- sets the boundaries (moral boundaries we shouldn’t cross), group solidarity (common enemy “the other”; united against the criminal), adaptation or innovation (why are there changes in attitudes toward crime?; crime helps move society forward and allows society to change its rules of acceptable behaviour [revise its boundaries]), tension-reduction  Durkheim’s quest- why people commit crime ; sociology can help societies to perfect sense of order (social harmony) by using empirical knowledge (scientific approach to sociology) Social Disorganization Theory  Social ecology of crime (Shaw and McKay, 1942)-places being a cause of crime not the individual  Looking at communities  Concentric zone theory- crime generally occurs in the transitional zone 1. Central business district (inner city); banks, financial institutions, noisy, no one wants to live here (mostly where people go to work) 2. Transitional zone- recent immigrant groups, deteriorated housing, factories, abandoned buildings, pushes people out, transitory (little investment into community; no long term intentions to stay here as people leave the first chance they get), characterized by slums 3. Working class zone- single family tenements, more stable 4. Residential zone- single family homes, yards/garages, middle class families, more spacious 5. Commuter zone- suburbs, no big city problems **is this the case only for American cities? Are Canadian cities organized this way?** (i.e. housing in downtown Toronto)  social disorganization endemic within zone 2; community doesn’t function as the residents want it to (social decay of institutions; no new buildings i.e. community centers) o community unable to recognize its values o factors in social disorganization:  transitional population- residential instability (people going in and out constantly); zone of last resort and people unable to establish bonds with other in this zone  racial/ethnic heterogeneity- diversity seen as a good thing, tend to isolate themselves because there is no common background among these people (people stuck to their own ethnic groups); not integrated well, language barrier (zone of immigration)  poverty- poverty doesn’t necessarily cause social disorganization but it promotes disorganization (tax base- less money to draw from and people are focused on survival)  Why do some communities have higher crime rates than others?- less crime in outer city (suburbs) than in inner cities  Crime exists in communities of ‘normal’ (similar) people o Social institutions in these areas had failed  How do you measure disorganization?  Used in policies as a way of combating crime Learning Theories  How people internalize values  Notion that criminal behaviour is learned and criminality is not innate; it is a byproduct of interacting with people  Crime is sometimes a normal/expected response to something in given context/circumstances  Neither free will (i.e. classical theories) nor individual characteristics emphasized; rather, focus is on process of how and what people learn  Who you grew up with it, how you grew up and in what context; environmental factors that affect how one socializes o Social environment’s effect on maturity and socialization process Differential Association Theory (Sutherland, 1927)  Theory developed at a time when it’s all about social structure/environment Criminal behaviour is  We don’t program ourselves but we acquire from another source learned  Criminal behaviour is learned just like regular behaviour through interaction with others Through interaction with  Why is crime a lower-class phenomenon? (not true but is the basis for many other people theories)  Learning criminal behaviour from personal, intimate groups Main part via intimate  Not everyone has the same influence over you (i.e. classmates vs. parents) personal groups Includes techniques,  Everything associated with the crime is learned (including attitude, etc. o
More Less

Related notes for SOC205H5

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit