Class Notes (786,668)
Canada (482,233)
Sociology (3,857)
SOC205H5 (139)
Lecture

SOC305 Sept 12.doc
Premium

4 Pages
74 Views
Unlock Document

School
University of Toronto Mississauga
Department
Sociology
Course
SOC205H5
Professor
Nicole Myers
Semester
Fall

Description
SOC305 Sept 12 th What is Criminology? - specific genre of discourse and inquire about crime – Garland o approaches to studying crime - study of making laws, the breaking of laws and society’s reaction to the breaking of laws - why people create, enforce, or nullify laws o why is something criminal - the way of generating knowledge – what are criminal motivations/de-motivations - innovation, trends and patterns - crime is a social phenomenon What is Theory, and Why are we Studying Theory? - a way of looking at the world and to understanding the world - the way to define/explain crime - theory is connected to questions and methodology - ex. Effects of capitalism on crime , ex. The way we regulate behaviour - theories are tested from people’s common sense of the world – as well as public opinion o a politics of crime - Policy Stems from Theory - who is the criminal - what is the particular problem - what is the nature of being human - what should the state regulate and not regulate – what is the state’s role What Should Criminology Study? - being interested in the way regulation is shifted – bylaws, criminal laws, etc - power and balance between different groups in society - what should the expert’s role be? - should it follow the research agenda of the criminal justice system - what influence should funding systems have - how do we make the system better and how do we improve efficiency Typology of Knowledge Production - innovation o paradigm shifts – accepted world views are changing  knowledge does not follow incremental steps towards progression - retrieval o using old theories and applying them into new contemporary concepts - translation o taking either new works or neglected works and starting to use them - reinterpretation o new intellectual concerns – applied in the past, apply again now - changing intellectual priorities o is the theory validated - changing social conditions o new social facts, new realities – what it means to live in 2012 than 1950 o cultural transformations, changing economy - developments in cognate fields of inquiry o biology, sociology, psychology etc Individual Explanations of Crime and Criminality 1. Classical Theory and Beccaria - enlightenment ideals - approached crime rationally – using more mathematical models and tools to map out human behaviour - all have free will – we decide what we will do - everyone seeks pleasure and avoids pain – utilitarian - we anticipate consequences and calculate outcomes - if we all have rationality, we can anticipate the outcomes of our actions o we are generally good people but we need negative motivation – pain - if pleasure outweighs pain, we can control crime - is there a different between criminals and non criminals – or do people weigh the pain and pleasure in different ways Beccaria on Crimes and Punishment - why punish? – the end of punishment is no other than to prevent others from committing the like offence - opposed to superstitious ideas – ex. witches to be burned - work was banned by the Catholic Church - proportionality: the degree of the punishment and the consequence of a crime ought to be contrived as to have the greatest possible effect on others, with the least possibly pain to the delinquent o was not about retribution, but more about prevention - what are his thoughts on the death penalty and torture? o torture is not the appropriate means – using torture to induce a confession only shows their ability to sustain torture – make them reach the breaking point is not a confession o the political intention of punishment is to terrify o prevention through certainty of punishment o nobility not important  punishment is to be estimated o punishment must be:  public – can’t be done behind closed doors – renders it useless  prompt – comes shortly thereafter the offence to show the link  necessary – not brutally punishing for the sake of it  lease possible given the circumstances, proportionate to the crime, and dictated by laws  in this sense, be believed the CJS should be able to stop people from committing crimes Where do we See Classical Theory Today? - Schissel – determinations of culpability (guilt, did you do it or not) - deterrence theory – ways to prevent people from committing crime o if you accept deterrence, you accept the love of pleasure, the hate of pain, assumes an ego-centric model o 3 crucial elements to deterrence theory:  1. severity – pain must outweigh the pleasure of the crime – need to keep increasing the severity as people increase the pleas
More Less

Related notes for SOC205H5

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit