Class Notes (839,081)
Canada (511,183)
Sociology (4,081)
SOC309H5 (17)
Lecture

Lecture3outline-SOC309-Summer2013.rtf

5 Pages
76 Views

Department
Sociology
Course Code
SOC309H5
Professor
Ivanka Knezevic

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
Class Outline Course SOC309H5F Lecture 14/05/2013 Topic: Media and politics - the news Effects of ownership concentration on content Media regulation Key educational goals/outcomes for today: Explore the reciprocal relationship between society (and politics in particular) and news coverage in mass media. Understand that social reality appears in the news (and entertainment) mediated through processes of agenda setting and framing. Identify social actors most likely to influence the news. Understand the importance of mass media content for the public judgment on importance and meaning of social issues. Readings Barron, Christie and Dany Lacombe. 2005. “Moral Panic and the Nasty Girl”, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 42: 1. 51-69. Taylor, Lisa. 2011. The End of Silly Season. Canadian Journalism Foundation.August 31. Online. http://j-source.ca/article/end-silly-season. Tewksbury, David. 2003. “What DoAmericans Really Want to Know? Tracking the Behavior of News Readers on the Internet.” Journal of Communication. 53, 4: December. 694-710. Questions to guide the reading/to think about ahead of time for students What is a moral panic? What do Barron and Lacombe see as the root cause of the moral panic about the “nasty girl”? How does treatment of youth offenders and non-offenders differ under the “Secure CareAct”? Compare changes in young girl violent crime rates in the last twenty years to changes in public perception of female youth violence. What is a “silly season”? What consequences does it have for the content of news media? Does the “silly season” facilitate moral panics? Explain your answer. What would Taylor have the media do about political grandstanding she describes? Tewksbury writes that the Internet “provides audiences with substantially more control over news selection process that they enjoyed with the traditional media.” Would Eveland agree with this view? Why? What is your own opinion? What factors increase news selectivity on the Internet? Note the alternate explanations of citizens’limited exposure to public affairs news. Which do you favour? Why? What is the “civic obligation norm”? Which ideology of mass media underlies it? A GENDA FOR CLASS Introduction We continue our discussion of media ownership, and policies that Canadian andAmerican governments enacted in an effort to control ownership concentration and its effects on content. After that, we turn to today’s main topic: ways in which the society influences content of the news, and ways in which the news influence social and political processes. We will see that social reality is by no means reflected accurately in the news, and will look for reasons why. Effects of changes in production on new content 1 -decreased quality - proportion of political news inAmerican tv news broadcast has been falling over last 15 yrs - All major tv networks have closed ther foreign bureaus over last 20 yrs 2 lack of local news - can newspapers over last 20 yrs, if local newspaper is bought by large chain, first thing they do is fire local journalist. 3 homogenisation of non-local content rather than produce news in 20 places the chain will produce one centralized content.  states regulate mass media in order to achieve sensor sex, violence and political speech.. claiming some govt activity is so important that public should not have access to it.-to control the profit for the owner and project jobs, and receive taxes from the company Ideologies of mass media  influence regulation of ownership  1- Libertarian: govt should not interfere with free exchange of ideas o Excludes public state ownership of the media o American tradition  2- Public Service: info in the media is a public good o Government duty to regulate media in the public interest o British tradition  Canada combines the 2 models o E.g content regulations favour Canadian content in broadcasting. % has to be Canadian. Produced in Canada. Certain music could be 17% of other o Hate speech- any hate, discrimination prejudice against any grp. Forbidden bc media shouldn’t be able to do society harm Regulation of media ownership in the US  Telecommunications Act: 1996 removed barriers to cross media ownership w/in local markets and to monopolization within a medium  Rational: free competition would lead to better content  Outcome: elimination of local news and other content  Amendments in 2003 1. Further cross ownership (up tp 1 daily newspaper, 3 tv stations and 8 radio and 1 cable system in local market) 2. Further increase in a number of tv stations a company could own up to 45% of households in US  Unpublished FCC report leaked by senator barbera baxter (D-CA) in 06’local ownership of tv station increase the length of news broadcasts and the length of local news. Chain ownership of local broacasters gets rid of local broadcasts ect Regulation of med
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit