Class Notes (785,551)
Canada (481,659)
Sociology (3,854)
SOC310H5 (70)
Lecture 4

Lecture 4.docx

3 Pages
79 Views
Unlock Document

School
University of Toronto Mississauga
Department
Sociology
Course
SOC310H5
Professor
Abigail Salole
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 4- January 30, 2013 A century of youth justice in Canada (continued ) Ashley Smith  Difference between Smith and David Meffe- age, incarcerated for very long time; Smith eventually died in an adult facility  Similarities-incarcerated for fairly minor offence, didn’t get help they needed (i.e. psychological counseling)  Relevant concepts- poor management of inmates (didn’t check on their mental health), idea that to keep someone safe, they should be put in solitary confinement Moving Toward the YOA (cont’d)  More legislation regarding the responsibility of the juvenile offender was proposed in Bill C-61, An Act Respecting Young Offenders and to Repeal the Juvenile Delinquents Act  This legislation almost completely abandoned the welfarist tack of the JDA  Abandonment of welfare state under JDA moving toward YOA The YOA  Passed in 1982 (applied in 1984)  Main principles  Crime prevention  Accountability and responsibility  Protection of society  Limited maturity and special needs of young people (separate youth justice system)  The rehabilitation of young offender  Restraint of young offenders  Least possible interference with children’s freedom; always try the punishment that is the least harsh or interferes with the child’s freedom to the least extent  Special guarantees of the rights and freedoms of the young person; connected to Charter; young people always had access to a lawyer  The primary responsibility of parents for their children (involvement of parents) The YOA Becomes Law… Trouble Already?  Widely criticized by the public for apparent lack of deterrence  Broad, diverse and potentially conflicting principles  No guidance as to how to balance them  Biggest criticism was that it was not tough enough on juvenile crime!  YOA was characterized by amendment  Amendments passed in 1992 to “toughen” the YOA by cracking down on violent offenders  Increased sentence for murder from 3 to 5 years less a day  Parole eligibility reduced from 10-25 years to 5-10 years for cases transferred to adult court  Last attempt to toughen Canada’s approach to juvenile justice in 1994 with Bill C-37 Toward a Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice  Public and political opposition to the YOA reached a fever pitch by 1997  Failed to adequately deter young people from crime  Did not allow for appropriate punishments  Youth rights that had been granted under the Charter and enmeshed within the act seemingly shielded young offenders from feeling the sting of the YCJS  The YOA became a symbol of all that was wrong with “youth today”  The beginnings of the Youth Criminal Justice Act… The Violent Young Offender under the Failing YOA  Despite stabilizing (even declining) rates of youth crime and high rates of incarceration, the media helped create a perception that youth crime was out-of-control and young offenders were becoming more dangerous  The 1990’s saw the creation of the “punishable young offender” who was manifest in media reports  Media accounts and “spectacles” fueled the perception that YOA was ineffective  Young offenders as someone who should be punished  Very widely reported in the media  YJCA- government personnel actually educated with media to educate them about youth crime  In the media, the “face of youth crime” becomes the violent young offender  Victims and families of victims of youth crime became the focus of debates around how to efficiently strengthen Canadian responses to the youth crime problem  All crime stories generally hears statements from victims (i.e. family) and they somehow become the “experts”; how does someone become an expert like this?  “I am a victim and therefore an expert on crime” common idea in the media  Victims voice should be heard but it shouldn’t be the only side to the story  i.e. MADD- idea that we know crime and claim they have expert knowledge because they have been affected by drunk driving…  E.g. Chuck Cadman, whose son was stabbed and killed at 16 by a young offender, ran for federal office and was eventually appointed justice critic for the official opposition  Under the YOA Canada was sending youth into custody at 2X the rate of American courts  Very pervasive idea of the violent young offender  Over reliance on courts and custody  ¾ of young people sentenced under the YOA had not committed a violent crime  Detained for administrative breaches and property-related crimes  Toward New Legislation  In response to public d
More Less

Related notes for SOC310H5

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Submit