Class Notes (839,626)
Canada (511,431)
Sociology (4,081)
SOC349H5 (64)
Lecture

march 15.docx

4 Pages
131 Views

Department
Sociology
Course Code
SOC349H5
Professor
Michelle Szabo

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
Good Food: Discourse: A way of understanding something that is prevalent in a particular society a) becomes institutionalized through expert organizations, practices & language (but) b) can be contested by through the practices and languages of other social groups < Foucault something that we accept because its projected out in society through experts, practices & languages. Who are the people who create this discourse, the upper class, food scholars, critics, chefs etc. access to media, money, power in society. Not that we all accept this without question, some groups challenge discourse about food, difficult to challenge, we don’t question its just the discourse, some people resist and question it. Frieganism is alternative counter discourses. Authentic & Exotic is good food, it’s also ethical. Implications for Class & Race Who typically define it, white people from the upper class define mainstream discourse. Implication for inequality & also defining bad food, inauthentic not exotic & unhealthy. Moral Judgment on what type of food you consume, seen as unhealthy. Ethical eating & food politics Ethical Consumerism: Action: choose between products Goal: change objectionable company practices (regarding health, social justice, sustainability) 1930s/40s State- Company Focused Benefit All Focus activism on the state, changing legislation. Stopped factory farms benefits those buying meat. Post war 1980s+ rise of neoliberal Market-focused (ethical consumerism) benefits individual, neoliberal ethos, retreat of government, economic & social system works left, ethical consumerism. Effectiveness 3 1)Local, organic & better? You need less energy to grow food, if your bringing in from another state, emission cost, cheaper energy to grow it there, modes of transportation, train truck etc. 2) Greenwashing Is it effective, green washing co-opting environmental messages. You may be buying something better for the environment. 3) Overconsumption doesn’t address this the ethics 4) Feasibility Label confusion: doesn’t have enough information, lack of information don’t have enough to make choices 5) Status/Shame: printing t shirts, what happens if you don’t do that, et if you eat @ a place where they have ethical problems Democracy & Equal Access Dollar is your vote, more say for those with more money. Parkdale: Not a lot of places that sell ethical food Riverdale: upper class, lots of more choices for ethical food more white neighbor hood Ethical food desert Political Inaction: Political Anesthesia If that’s how you make the change, the local they see the idea as fixed, the pesticide issue is resolved for their family, they don’t think about political issues anymore, changing pesticide regulation, pressure local government to change legislation, inactive politically. Problematic: people disadvantaged who are not financially able, no policy is being changed, people who cant end up eating pesticides. Problems with ethical consumersi
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit