Class Notes (923,036)
CA (543,051)
UTM (25,004)
WGS (269)
WGS200Y5 (73)
Lecture 3

WGS200Y5 Lecture 3: WGS200 Readings

5 Pages
87 Views

Department
Women and Gender Studies
Course Code
WGS200Y5
Professor
Joan Simalchik

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Week 3
Chapter 11: Introduction to Beyond the Natural Body Nelly Oudshoorn
- During second wave of feminism, female biologist knew that nature does not
determine what we mean when we use terms like women, body and femininity.
- The opinion that social inequality between men and women was primarirly based
on biological sex differences.
- So, biology rather than society sets constrains on behavior and abilities of women
and it is women’s destiny and feminists have to accept it.
- Anatomical, endocrinological or immunological facts are anything but self evident.
- Our perception and interpretation of the body is mediated through language and in
society, biomedical sciences function as a major provider of this language.
- Was scientists not discovering the reality? The scientific acts are not objectively
given but collectively created.
- Scientists construct reality rather than discovering it.
Sex and the body:
- Medical texts from ancient Greeks described male and female bodies as similar.
- Similarities were assessed based on male bodies which constructed women’s
organs as similar but inferior constructed for patriarchal purposes.
- One sex model - the female body was understood as a male turned inside herself.
(lesser version of male’s body)
- Scientific and biomedical knowledge constructed the body as natural
- The ovary did not have a name of its own, and was described as female testicle,
referring to male organ.
- The anatomical atlas had a sex less skeleton drawings of bones in epitome.
- Man as a measure of all things and woman does not exist as an ontologically
distinct catergory.
- In the 18C criticism scientists focused on bodily differences familiar to our modern
day interpretation of the male/female body.
- Sex not confined to bodily organ but spread throughout the body
- Anatomists paid special attention to those parts of the skeleton that would become
socially significant amongst which was the skull.
- Skeleton sexualized women’s skull used to prove women intellectually inferior
- Cellular physiology focused on by scientists as a way to construct women as
passive. Female body became medical sight for creating difference between male
and female constructing the former as biologically inferior.
- By the 19C, the medical gaze shifted from bones to cells.
- Difference localized to a single organ the uterus then to the ovaries.
- By late 19TH century, it extended this sexualization to every body part: Bones,
blood vessels, cells, hair, brain. Only the eye seem to have no sex.
- Female and male bodies were now opposite bodies with different organs, functions
and feelings.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
- Following this, female body became par excellence and emphasized woman’s
unique sexual character.
- Then, the attention shifted from organs to ovaries. Thought to be the essence of
femininity.
- Thus, the ovaries were perceived as organs of crises. This resulted in widespread
of surgical removal of ovaries.
- This procedure for the treatment of menstrual irregularities and various neuroses.
- Then, in 20 Century, essence of femininity became located in sex hormones.
- Many types of behaviors, roles, functions and characteristics considered to be
typically male or female in western culture ascribed to hormones.
- Female body has become the body completely controlled by hormones
- This was coined in 1905, after two decades, the pharmaceutical companies began
the mass production of harmones.
- Women around the world now are taking hormonal pills and use it to explain our
bodies.
- Feminist scientists suggest that cultural stereotype about male/female play an
important role in shaping scientific theories.
Chapter 12: The Egg and the Sperm Emily Martin
- Stereotypes imply that female biological processes are less worthy than their male
counterparts.
- Menstruation is described to produce egg and fertilized in order for reproduction.
However, there is more negative constructs around it.
- According to medical text, It is seen as a representative of dying, dead cells that
ceases to have any function. Essentially seen as a failure.
- Male reproductive is evaluated differently. Sperms are thought to be better
because millions of it are produced everyday.
- The question is how come male sperm not seen as wasteful.
- The scientific language used constructs sperm as lively, vigorous, penetrating the
egg and constructs the egg as static waiting to be penetrated.
- Eggs are seen to be existing from the time of birth and sitting in shelf, slowly
degenerating while sperms are produced.
- The female process has a vivid description like ripening of eggs while sperms is
seen as a hero.
- The egg needs to be rescued by the sperm or else it will die.
- Women’s eggs are seen as wasteful – oogenesis where most of the eggs are
degenerated.
- Sperms are produced in trillions of amount but the over production is not seen as
wasteful.
- The scientific language shows sperm to be masculine and strong while egg to be
feminine and passive not actively doing anything.
- Terms like corona crown for egg and survivor for sperm is used.
- Picture it as a fairy tale eggs is the sleeping beauty waiting for the kiss and sperm
as a prince.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Week 3 Chapter 11: Introduction to Beyond the Natural Body – Nelly Oudshoorn - During second wave of feminism, female biologist knew that nature does not determine what we mean when we use terms like women, body and femininity. - The opinion that social inequality between men and women was primarirly based on biological sex differences. - So, biology rather than society sets constrains on behavior and abilities of women and it is women’s destiny and feminists have to accept it. - Anatomical, endocrinological or immunological facts are anything but self evident. - Our perception and interpretation of the body is mediated through language and in society, biomedical sciences function as a major provider of this language. - Was scientists not discovering the reality? – The scientific acts are not objectively given but collectively created. - Scientists construct reality rather than discovering it. Sex and the body: - Medical texts from ancient Greeks described male and female bodies as similar. - Similarities were assessed based on male bodies which constructed women’s organs as similar but inferior constructed for patriarchal purposes. - One sex model - the female body was understood as a male turned inside herself. (lesser version of male’s body) - Scientific and biomedical knowledge constructed the body as natural - The ovary did not have a name of its own, and was described as female testicle, referring to male organ. - The anatomical atlas had a sex less skeleton drawings of bones in epitome. - Man as a measure of all things and woman does not exist as an ontologically distinct catergory. - In the 18C criticism scientists focused on bodily differences familiar to our modern day interpretation of the male/female body. - Sex not confined to bodily organ but spread throughout the body - Anatomists paid special attention to those parts of the skeleton that would become socially significant amongst which was the skull. - Skeleton sexualized women’s skull used to prove women intellectually inferior - Cellular physiology focused on by scientists as a way to construct women as passive. Female body became medical sight for creating difference between male and female constructing the former as biologically inferior. - By the 19C, the medical gaze shifted from bones to cells. - Difference localized to a single organ the uterus then to the ovaries. - By late 19THcentury, it extended this sexualization to every body part: Bones, blood vessels, cells, hair, brain. Only the eye seem to have no sex. - Female and male bodies were now opposite bodies with different organs, functions and feelings. - Following this, female body became par excellence and emphasized woman’s unique sexual character. - Then, the attention shifted from organs to ovaries. Thought to be the essence of femininity. - Thus, the ovaries were perceived as organs of crises. This resulted in widespread of surgical removal of ovaries. - This procedure for the treatment of menstrual irregularities and various neuroses. - Then, in 20 Century, essence of femininity became located in sex hormones. - Many types of behaviors, roles, functions and characteristics considered to be typically male or female in western culture ascribed to hormones. - Female body has become the body completely controlled by hormones - This was coined in 1905, after two decades, the pharmaceutical companies began the mass production of harmones. - Women around the world now are taking hormonal pills and use it to explain our bodies. - Feminist scientists suggest that cultural stereotype about male/female play an important role in shaping scientific theories. Chapter 12: The Egg and the Sperm – Emily Martin - Stereotypes imply that female biological processes are less worthy than their male counterparts. - Menstruation is described to produce egg and fertilized in order for reproduction. However, there is more negative constructs around it. - According to medical text, It is seen as a representative of dying, dead cells that ceases to have any function. Essentially seen as a failure. - Male reproductive is evaluated differently. Sperms are thought to be better because millions of it are produced everyday. - The question is how come male sperm not seen as wasteful. - The scientific language used constructs sperm as lively, vigorous, penetrating the egg and constructs the egg as static waiting to be penetrated. - Eggs are seen to be existing from the time of birth and sitting in shelf, slowly degenerating while sperms are produced. - The female process has a vivid description like “ripening of eggs” while sperms is seen as a hero. - The egg needs to be rescued by the sperm or else it will die. - Women’s eggs are seen as wasteful – oogenesis – where most of the eggs are degenerated. - Sperms are produced in trillions of amount but the over production is not seen as wasteful. - The scientific language shows sperm to be masculine and strong while egg to be feminine and passive – not actively doing anything. - Terms like corona – crown for egg and “survivor” for sperm is used. - Picture it as a fairy tale – eggs is the sleeping beauty waiting for the kiss and sperm as a prince. Thinking Beyond: - Important to think beyond the biological. - Biology provides another model that can be applied to egg and sperm. - Cybernetic model: Flexible adaptation to change within a whole, evolution over time and changing response to environment. - The model has a potential to shift our negative imagery to positive regarding female reproductive system. - However, it is hardly neutral and has imposition of social control. - Shifts to psychosocial and environment brought with emphasis on social control. - Scientists used Darwin’s origin of species to explain this - Origin stood for description of the natural world with competition and it could be reimported as social science – social Darwinism. - These approaches make the stereotypical images more powerful and they feel natural. - Stereotypical image – cellular bride (female fatale) and a cellular groom (her victim) make a cellular baby. - Women however struggle more as their activities are restricted to protect the fetus, fetal surgery, resciding of abortion rights etc. - This approach influenced by eugenics invested in racial and classed ideologies that shaped how particular women and men se
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit