Class Notes (839,055)
Canada (511,173)
Anthropology (1,602)
ANTB19H3 (119)


6 Pages

Course Code
Donna Young

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Key Concepts: Colonial Rule; Participant – Observation; Cultural Translation and Idiomatic Speech, Objectivity 1. Colonial Rule and its Aftermath - Nineteenth-century administrative and bureaucratic interventions came to play a disruptive role in the lives of people around the world, as they were reconstituted as “subjects” of colonial rule and emerging nation states. - During the first half of the twentieth century, the breakup of empires spawned large-scale displacements of people. The collapse of the Ottoman Empire after WW 1 was followed by violence of various forms: o Structural violence of poverty and the threat of starvation o Racist ideologies that led to terror and discrimination o Ethno-nationalist exclusions orchestrated by emerging states and empires Ex: manifest destiny; based on a notion of nationality which is built around what people claim as their ethnological group Ex: Germany, the rise of the nationalist party Israel, the rise of the Jewish state Canadian example: Quebec, nationalist pride o Modern warfare WW1 o “Ethnic Cleansing” Rwanda Armenian Eugenics The holocaust - Evans-Pritchard, a British anthropologist, goes to work in the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium Government of the Sudan (1899-1956). Past WW2 for a full decade. o The Sudan was administered as a British Imperial possession. o Pursuing a policy of divide and rule, stressed the ethnic differences and frictions between the Sudan’s many ethnic and tribal groups. From 1924 onwards, the British divided the Sudan into two separate territories-a predominantly Muslim-Arabic speaking north, and a predominantly Animist and Christian South. Christian because they put up 2 strucutarly very different ways of ruling; in the north where there were already forms of dynasties, the idea would be to go in and conquer the head of the dynasty and once you had him, everybody else below him also came under your thumb In the south, where there were more tribal groups, they sent in district commissioners who ruled directly o The Colonial administration in the South requests Evans-Pritchard’s help. o Evans Pritchard is the first one to do participant observation research in Africa He took their philosophy extremely seriously o They do not know how to govern the Nuer, who are war-like and steal cattle from their neighbors, the Dinka. o Evans-Pritchard wrote: “I think there generally is a hostile attitude to anthropological inquiries. Anthropology smells to them as cultural colonialism, an arrogant assertion of European superiority; and they have some justification for their suspicions and resentment, for anthropologists in the past too readily lent and sold themselves in the service of colonial interests” (1976: 250). Why were the Nuer hostile to the British? Unfortunately, much if not most ethnographic fieldwork in the 20 century took place under political conditions of colonization and/or occupation in which people were subjected, as we have seen in the case of North American Indians, and now will see in the case of the Nuer of Southern Sudan. When evans-Pritchard went to study the Nuer he was a member of the conquering group! In the introduction to the Nuer we learn that it was the re-conquest of the Anglo- Egyptian Sudan in 1899 by the British that forms the context for his study of the Nuer in the 1930s. He begins his research by reading reports of early explorers, colonial administrators, and missionaries. Furthermore his study of the Nuer, in which he intends “to describe the life of the Nuer, and to lay bare some of their principles of their social structure” is hoped to be of some value to both anthropology students, and to colonial administrators (7). I do not mean to suggest E-P’s study is therefore contaminated by colonialism. But as students learning to be critical readers of ethnography, you must pay attention to the wider historical and political contexts that frame a particular study of a particular people at a particular time. You should always ask yourself: 1.How did the ethnographer gain access to the community he/she writes about? 2. How do political and economic arrangements mark the relationship between ethnographer and those being observed, studied? 3. What theoretical concerns motivate the study? These questions change over time. So part of your task is to figure out what the questions are and why they are being asked at that particular time. EP wrote: One cannot have the answers without knowing what the questions are. One needs a rigorous training in general theory before attempting field research…to know what is significant in the light of theory. But EP goes on to say that it is not jus
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.