Class Notes (835,241)
Canada (509,043)
Anthropology (1,586)
ANTB19H3 (119)


3 Pages
Unlock Document

Donna Young

Lecture. Tribal Politics The challenge for EP was to uncover political structures where none seemed apparent. This was a radically egalitarian society that recognized no central authority or common political organization. On the round, it looked chaotic, especially to colonial administrators. But EP argued there was indeed a political structure and he called it tribal politics. On page 102, EP argues that a “Tribe” has the following distinctive features: 1. A common and distinct name. 2. A common sentiment. 3. A common and distinct territory. 4. A moral obligation to unite in war. 5. A moral obligation to settle feuds and disputes through arbitration. 6. A tribe is segmented, with some opposition. 7. There is often a dominant clan in a tribal area. 8. A tribe is one unit in a system of units. 9. Age sets are organized tribally. Part of the confusion in understanding Nuer tribal politics is that they are often expressed in terms of patrilineage and kin relations. So remember, politics is always concerned with territory and power over that territory. Often, those with whom you share territory are family, agnates (male kin traced through your patrilineage) and cognates (men and women you are related to through the patrilineage) and affines (those to whom you are related through marriage. The Nuer are exogamous. They cannot marry anyone to whom they are related. So one must know one’s kin relations so that one can determine whom one might be allowed to marry. But one’s tribal affiliation is determined by where you live. Age sets are determined by territory, residence. The Nuer say: “Home is where the cattle are”. This is the first important tribal sentiment. Kinship Structure Political Structure Patrilineage Tribe Agnates, Cognates, Affines Clans (Dominant) - Bull of the Camp Kinship determines whom Residence determines you may marry, etc tribal affiliation Both over lap and are marked by segmentation and structural oppositions. Segmentary lineage system Primary, Secondary, Tertiary E-P says on page 147-148: “political values are relative and … the political system is an equilibrium between opposed tendencies towards fission and fusion, between the tendency of all groups to segment, and the tendency of all groups to combine with segments of the same order. What might cause segmentation? Class Enactment: The Feud Two brothers with young families live side by side on the land they were brought up on. Draught is severe. Their herds graze too closely together and a dispute erupts. They begin to feud, raiding from each other, arguing about access to watering holes etc. At this point family member and tribal members come together to insist that the brothers settle the feud. It is determined that one brother will take his cattle and family and go live with his wife’s people. He leaves his agnates, and goes to live in another tribal area. This is segmentation: fission. Things are okay for a while, but soon the two brothers find that their respective tribes are fighting over the same herd at a watering hole. The two
More Less

Related notes for ANTB19H3

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.