Class Notes (834,384)
Canada (508,507)
Anthropology (1,586)
ANTC23H3 (18)

Genital Morphology.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

Joyce Parga

Genital Morphology Penile morphology in primates - Wide variety of penile morphology, even among closely related primate species - Why are there differences? A-E has al different galago species. Why? - Can use penile morphology alone to tell galago species apart. Just by penis shape they can tell what species they are looking at. Penis are more differentiated than the body shape Why diversity in penile morphology in primates? - Hypothesis 1. Lock and Key hypothesis – complex genitalia ensure that different species are prevented from inter-breeding o  Male and female genitalia should be structurally complementary within a species o Only a few examples from the genus Macaca support this hypothesis  FIG. 9.2 UO (urethal opening where semen comes out) they all fit pretty well. But this is the only example. If you look at other species such as galago you don’t see one-to-one correspondence. o Problems with this hypothesis:  In some species with diverse penile morphology (i.e. galagos), male and female genitalia do not “match”. Matching between different primates species can occur. i.e. captive galagos  Other mechanisms keep different species from inter-breeding. Species-specific vocalizations, behaviours, olfactory cues, etc.  Strong support for this hypothesis is lacking. 2. Genitalic recognition hypothesis - Variant of the lock and key hypothesis – females’ bodies “recognize” males of their species by the stimulation they receive during mating  makes more sense for species that are induced ovulators - Induced ovulators o Induced ovulation: ovulation only occurs in response to the act of copulation - Spontaneous ovulation o Spontaneous ovulation: ovulation occurs cyclically, and it NOT dependent on mating -  No strong support for this hypothesis 3. Pleitropism hypothesis: - Pleiotropy: when a change to one gene affects unrelated phenotypic traits. o  Changes in male genitalia are caused by genetic changes in other systems acted upon by natural selection. o  No strong support for this hypothesis 4. Mechanical conflict of interest hypothesis - Male genitalia evolve to bypass female “barriers” to reproduction, or to damage the female reproductive tract/genitalia - i.e. if penis damages female’s vagina and decreases her inside so she cannot mate with anyone else at the cost of hers .  not genetically applicable to primates  no support for this hypothesis in primates, but outside of male it does apply - 5. Cryptic female choice hypothesis – macaques mating - Male genitalia have evolved to function as an “internal courtship device”  females may unconsciously select the sperm of certain males over others - Predicts that the most elaborate male genitalia should be found where females mate with >1 male while they are fertile. o Dispersed and polygynandrous mating systems -  Speculative hypothesis at present - In many studies they have to kill females to see how far the sperm has travelled. with priamtes it is hard so it is
More Less

Related notes for ANTC23H3

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.