Class Notes (837,447)
Canada (510,273)
Anthropology (1,602)
ANTC61H3 (76)
Lecture

lec3.docx

3 Pages
104 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Anthropology
Course
ANTC61H3
Professor
Bianca Dahl
Semester
Fall

Description
ANTC61: Lecture 3 (September 25, 2012) Next week’s tutorial – controversial medical issue and its representations inherit in the media (illness, disease, Medical Anthro. Language = metaphors) Amputee wannabes - e.g. UK doctor’s medical license was revoked after performing two amputees to two BIID patients. He felt that it was more reasonable to do it in a control hospital environment - diagnosable disorder Recap from last week: - kleinman: Illness – individual’s interpretations Disease – biological/doctor’s interpretations Sickness – macrosocial/political context in regards to disease - scheper-hughes and lock: o 3 types of bodies:  individual  social – metaphors used by society regarding the issue * reflected to the readings this week  political - Greg and Saha: o biomedicine and the concept of cultural medicine  how doctors and patients interact  how doctors misinterpret the symptoms  doctors categorizing = producing stereotypes and more problems by doctors  immigrant and minority issues  doctors’ awareness of culture this week’s readings: - sontag: o language shapes and reflects our ideas about illness – stigma lies in language o kinds of metaphors we used to describe diseases and describe symptoms and bodies shape the individual’s experience of the disease o TB vs Cancer  TB’s representation fit in the “suffering in silence” and made in passive = fashionable at the time  through the metaphors  Cancer – was a death sentence  through the military metaphors she used o Her experience of having breast cancer = was utterly stigmatized and awful because it was shameful according the society at that time 1 - Ehrenreich: o “relentless brightsiding” of the cancer awareness industry is a “pink- washing” or covering over of the underlying structural causes of cancer (carcinogens), and curtails women’s rage against it o shift on advocacy and awareness of cancer compared to before  angry on how same companies benefit through profiting from “awareness of cancer” but the same companies who make us more susceptible to cancer. - Jain and Ehrenreich: o offers a “queer” reading of its heteronormative-ness and asks, what you think about cancer as communal event o significantly higher risk of African American woman than higher upper class white American women  genetics and social factors? o Cancer as a communal event = vs. cancer as not being ment
More Less

Related notes for ANTC61H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit