Class Notes (809,197)
Canada (493,572)
BIOB50H3 (243)
Lecture 17

Lecture 17.docx

15 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Biological Sciences
Marc Cadotte

Lecture 17 – Species Diversity in Communities (chapter 18) Recall The competitive exclusion principle: Two species that use a limiting resource in the same way cannot coexist. Joseph Grinnell first used the term ‘niche’ in 1917, as : “no two species of birds or mammals will be found to occupy precisely the same niche” Why do we see in natural communities that there is this overwhelming case that there is extremely high species diversity despite the fact that there is extreme resource limitation. One example of this: Paradox of the Plankton – GE Hutchinson - He observed that there were 30-40 phytoplankton species in the freshwater lake system. All of these species competed for the same set of limited resources (eg: carbon dioxide). Even though they were competing for these resources, there was still a very high amount of species diversity. - How can we explain this? Heterogeneity: in terms of species pool size, the abiotic conditions in which we may have species, and also species interactions that control species diversity. Community Membership Species richness differs among communities due to variation in regional species pools, abiotic conditions, and species interactions. Glacier National Park in USA: made up of very distinct communities such as meadows, lakes, forests, etc. Each of these communities is highly distinct and they have their own species compositions, species richness, etc. Some species can move between communities but they still remain relatively distinct. So how do these species get to the communities that they end up in? We need to look at community membership at the local scale. Figure 18.4 Community Membership: A Series of Filters There are 3 interacting filters that work to include and exclude species from local communities. There is no one single process that is responsible for the distribution and abundance of species rather the interaction of these factors that both include and exclude species from local communities. 1. The regional species pool provides an upper limit on the number and types of species that can be present in a community. The regional species pool acts as a supplier to the local communities through species dispersal and immigration. Regions of high species richness have communities of high species richness. The importance of dispersal can be seen in cases of non-native species invasions. Humans have recently expanded the regional species pool of communities by acting as vectors of dispersal by bring species previously limited in their dispersal capabilities into new communities. Eg: Zebra mussel – it is a huge threat to our local marine ecosystems. They were brought over by the ballast water carried by ships. It is a destructive invader of the inland waterways of North America and was brought there from Europe. Wrecked havoc on the ecological systems and human infrastructure. Pg. 390-391 Figure: Regions of high species richness will also have communities of high species richness because of the role of dispersal within these communities. 2. Abiotic Factors: species may be able to reach a community but be physiologically unable to tolerate the biotic or abiotic conditions of the environment. Some abiotic constraints are obvious (e.g., fish on land, or more subtle; a lake might not support organisms that require fast-flowing water). Eg: when the ballast water of ships from Asia come to North America then the non native species may find themselves in waters that may not have the right temperature or salinity in order to survive and grow. 3. Species Interactions: The final cut requires coexistence with other species. For species that depend on other species for growth, reproduction, or survival, those other species must be present. Species may be excluded from a community by competition, predation, parasitism, or disease. Eg: Biotic resistance – the native species of a community have a biotic resistance to the non native species of a community. - When a non- native species enters a community, the native species may choose to exclude or slow down the growth of the non-native species. For example, the non native species Garlic Mustard, there is an issue in Ontario, may have to face herbivores that it may not have to face in its native range and also other issues such as competition and disease. How are species able to coexist? Community Membership There are three schools of thought what controls community diversity: Equilibrium theory—ecological and evolutionary compromises lead to resource partitioning in order to reduce competition. Nonequilibrium theory—fluctuating conditions keep dominant species from monopolizing resources. (eg: disturbance, predation, etc.) Neutral theory—species do not differ and diversity patterns are a product of dispersal, speciation and demographic stochasticity. The individual species do not matter, what is important is the dispersal, etc of the species. Equilibrium Theories The competitive exclusion principle: Two species that use a limiting resource in the same way cannot coexist. (We don’t always end up seeing this in nature) Resource partitioning among the species in a community reduces competition and increases species richness. Resource partitioning—competing species are more likely to coexist when they use resources in different ways. On the x axis is resource partitioning which can represent different nutrients an the habitat type that a species requires. The species are each of the curves so in total there are 5 species in this community. On the y axis is the amount of variability of available resources (not the amount). There is overlap between the curves which means that there is more competition between the species. When there is total overlap, we expect to see competition exclusion so that one species would drive the other species to extinction. Areas of less overlap between the curves show less partitioning of resources so the species compete less intensely with one another. There are a number of ways in which resource partitioning may result in species richness. In B species richness can be high because they show a degree of partitioning along the different spectra. Especially when there are more species being packed into a community, we notice that there is very little overlap between species which can be a result of specialization or character displacement which both reduce competition over time. In C, species richness can be high because there is a broader resource spectrum. There is a greater diversity of resources available to be used by a wider variety of species. Equilibrium Theories Figure 18.8 Resource Partitioning by Warblers MacArthur (1958) looked at resource partitioning in whole communities. He recorder the feeding habitats, nesting locations, and breeding territories of 5 species of Warblers to find out how they coexist with one another in the face of resource need. He found that the Warblers used different parts of the habitat or tree canopy in different ways by using different heights and different depths of the tree canopy. The species may overlap but mostly they use different parts of the canopy.. This supported his hypothesis that the Warblers are able to coexist despite the fact that they have to use the same habitat for those food resources. In further studies, MacArthur and MacArthur (1961) looked at bird communities in 13 different habitats. There was a positive relationship between bird species diversity and foliage height diversity (number of vegetation layers, a measure of habitat complexity, a proxy for how broad the spectrum is in which they are in). He was asking if there is a greater number of resource diversity and if there is a correlation between the number of species in the system. Figure 18.9 Bird Species Diversity is Higher in More Complex Habitats. He found that there is a positive relationship between foliage height diversity and birds species diversity. However, interestingly, bird species diversity was not related to plant diversity other than height diversity. This suggests that trees species identity was less important that the structural complexity of the habitat. MacArthur found a strong correlation between broader resources and high species richness. Equilibrium Theories Tillman’s experiment of two diatoms that competed for silica. When he varied the different ratios of silica to phosphorus depending on whether it was high or low, what he observed was that in every scenario, one species would drive the other species to extinction (complete exclusion). However, in nature, both species are able to coexist. Why can’t we relicate this in experimental settings? Resource Partitioning To explain how diatom species coexist in nature, Tilman proposed the resource ratio hypothesis—species coexist by using resources in different proportions. In exper
More Less

Related notes for BIOB50H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.