Lecture 07

3 Pages
60 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Biological Sciences
Course
BIOC54H3
Professor
Kamini Persaud
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 7: The Evolution of SOCIAL Behaviour (Kin/NON-kin)  Why do some animals live in groups while others do not?  It comes down to benefits versus costs  Benefits: dealing with the physical environment, information, protection, territory defense, predation/hunting  Costs: competition for food & mates, energy and time of dominance interactions, disease, risk of brood parasitism, conspicuousness  COSTS  competition for MATES  Female Aggression Over Matings in Red Deer: they all want to mate with the same male; especially the oestrous female (alpha male)  competition over NESTING SITES;  best nesting sites hard to come by!  You share but you want your offspring to have the resources = so dump the other female’s eggs (ovicide)  Female removing eggs has less laid eggs but has more eggs incubated  Dominance interactions: ENERGETIC COSTS  Takes time + energy to live in a group  A “poor start to life” affects ability to dominate in male Green Swordtails  PG; poor food in beginning  GG; good food all the time  GG tends to show more aggressive behaviour than PG; who show more defensive behaviour!  Parasitic Infection  Greater population means greater risk of infection  In the beginning, as brood size increases then LRS increases but later LRS decreases b/c of increased parasite infections.  BUT...being social has its benefits!  BENEFITS  Dealing/protection with the physical environment; e.g. huddle together and warm each other can make difference of couple degrees. It helps them survive!  Information Centres; reap the same benefits from individual who HAS spent time + energy on gaining info.  Protection from predators; spend less time being vigilant with increased group size! e.g. emit sounds + stand erect when predator is around!  QUESTION: Why does a California Ground Squirrel spend less of their time being vigilant with increased group size?  Hypothesis 1: Dilution effect (safety in numbers; other individuals offer protection by simply existing)  Hypothesis 2: Increased detection (“many eyes”; others offer protection by being vigilant)  Hypothesis 2 is correct since the amount of vigilance is the same regardless of distance between you and your neighbour. Individuals pay attention to...ALARM CALLING!  Cooperative Hunting; obtain food you can’t obtain ALONE. It’s observed when benefits>costs! e.g. small mammals  Summary:  Benefits: 1. dealing with the ph
More Less

Related notes for BIOC54H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit