Class Notes (839,097)
Canada (511,185)
MDSA01H3 (326)
Ted Petit (46)

Chapter 04.pdf

3 Pages

Media Studies
Course Code
Ted Petit

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Media Studies Chapter 4 PragmaticAnalysis Philosophies Pragmatic Philosophies – truth: effect, outcome, and practicality – depends on degree to which concept/theory provide us with useful results in the process of solving problems – believing / not believing has no real bearing on one's daily life – truth must be based on tangible results and possible consequences of supporting / disregarding it – truth = label / quality that a thing an possess or lack (always dependent on contextual factors) Metaphysical Philosophies – truth: constant waiting to be discovered – cannot actually be fully known Pragmatists William James – first to stress: practical applications of philosophy to one's life – function of philosophy: find out what definite difference it will make to you and me, at definite instants of life, if this world formula be the true one – focus: consequences of individual belief – individuals: mature and grow by addressing personal problems through a pragmatic lens – stressed: flexible moderation between extremes as the best way to achieve this goal – preoccupied: state of the soul, not the social conditions of life John Dewey – processes of knowing and learning: within the field of human activity and experience – thought: direct result of physical beings encountering difficulties in their daily lives + generating ways of overcoming difficulties – we learn from past experiences in order to manage future ones – philosophy = tool in correcting problems – educators should focus: training students to develop a variety of problem solving skills in order to make them more productive + responsible citizens (decrease social problems) – education: connecting individual evolution to social improvements Richard Rorty – overcame one of the key criticisms levelled against pragmatism – Relativism: belief that diverse approaches and theories related to a given subject are all equally correct – there is no consistent truth to act upon – pragmatic perspective: government regulation of media industries – allows us to judge the worth of regulation according to the perceived outcomes and effects of the regulation – regulatory policy = true / worthy / good = best meets the needs of society – pragmatic meliorism: recognition of the elements present in a historical moment and a dedication to developing ways of improving them Government Regulation Best Regulatory Solutions = have beneficial consequences according to the contingencies of their historical moment Consequences – clear effects of a given regulation on society at large – good consequences: beneficial to society Contingencies – the factors that a regulation should address as a result of context and situation – contingent factors that influence the possible types of regulation – i.e. Social norms + predominant mediums / types of technology present – first set of contingencies: tension between free speech + public interest – government will intervene in the interest of the public (to make the media more efficient) – second set of contingencies: interplay between government regulation and media self-regulation – social responsibility theory: the media is in the service of the public + should be guided by issues of public concern – FCC: Federal Communications Commission (regulates broadcasting, wire, satellite, and cable services – Federal Trade Commission: regulates advertising in public relations – media industries: regulate themselves in an effort to reduce the escape of government regulation Issues in Regulation Combating Monopoly – regulations: designed to prevent media monopolies (limiting the amount of a given market that anyone company can have) – ensuring healthy competition remains – anti-monopoly regulation: Fin-Syn Rules (Financial Interest and Syndication Rules) – represented an attempt to halt a network programming monopoly to promote the growth of independents – break-up the perceived monopoly of the major networks – limiting the network's financial control over their programming – limit the amount of broadcasted programming that networks can hold financial
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.