Class Notes (905,915)
CA (538,528)
UTSC (32,637)
MGEA02H3 (186)
Lecture

Lecture notes week 10

4 Pages
141 Views

Department
Economics for Management Studies
Course Code
MGEA02H3
Professor
Gordon Cleveland

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
ECMA04 – Week 10
OLIGOPOLY
Oligopoly is a market in which there are only a few sellers.
How many?
So few that they feel the effects of each other’s decisions. (cigarette companies, the banks, oil producers, steel producers, car
companies, insurance companies, cereal producers, electronics, etc)
When top four firms control large % of sales
Four-firm concentration ratio = share of sales in hands of top four firms in industry.
In Canada:
Four firm concentration ratio is over 50% for tobacco products, petroleum and coal products, transportation equipment, primary
metals, beverages, metal mining
x broadly defined industries
Suppose we have two firms competing in a given market, producing identical output (homogeneous, standardized product - just like
perfect competition). The decision each firm has to make is:
“How much output should I try to sell, given what I think the other producer might try to sell?
Firm #1 decides on q1
Firm #2 decides on q2
Each firm has MC = AC = $2, no matter how much they produce (that is, TC1 = 2q1 andTC2 = 2q2)
The key to this problem is that each firm chooses its own output, but price depends on BOTH firms’ decisions
TC1 = 2q1 and TC2 = 2q2 and P = 14 - QT and QT = q1 + q2
For example, if firm #1 chooses q1 = 2
then if q2 = 2, P = 10
if q2 = 3, P = 9
if q2 = 4, P = 8
On the other hand, if firm #1 chooses q1 = 3
then if q2 = 2, P = 9
if q2 = 3, P = 8
if q2 = 4, P = 7
So, to repeat, the outcome (your profits, if you are one of the firms) depends not only on your decision but also on the other firm’s
decision
How to model this kind of decision?
Economists use a concept known as “Prisoners’ Dilemma”
Story: A robbery is committed, and police catch two ex-cons whom they strongly suspect of the crime. There is some evidence, but
not enough to convict them of the robbery itself. Without more evidence, the best the prosecutor can do is convicting them of minor
things that will earn TWO YEARS in jail.
So police separate the two suspects and offer each of them the following offer: “If you will confess, and if your partner denies the
crime, we will let you off with 6 months in jail, and your partner will get 10 years in jail. If you both confess, you will both get 5
years.”
So, each prisoner has a problem (a dilemma”).
You don’t know what your partner will do, but whatever he does, you are better off confessing:
x If your partner denies the crime, you can get off with 6 months (instead of 2 years) by confessing
x If your partner confesses, you are going to jail, but you end up with 5 years (instead of 10 years) by confessing
So you confess, as does your partner (he faces the same dilemma), and you end up with 5 years each (instead of 2 years if you both
deny the crime)
Economists think of the Prisoners’ Dilemma as a classic “Game Theorysituation – your payoff in the game depends on both your
decision and the other person’s decision. We treat this as a “game” and look at outcomes based on decisions.
Collective well-being vs. individual well-being
So let’s construct apayoff matrixrepresenting outcomes based on decisions:
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
ECMA04 Week 10 OLIGOPOLY Oligopoly is a market in which there are only a few sellers. How many? So few that they feel the effects of each others decisions. (cigarette companies, the banks, oil producers, steel producers, car companies, insurance companies, cereal producers, electronics, etc) When top four firms control large % of sales Four-firm concentration ratio = share of sales in hands of top four firms in industry. In Canada: Four firm concentration ratio is over 50% for tobacco products, petroleum and coal products, transportation equipment, primary metals, beverages, metal mining N broadly defined industries Suppose we have two firms competing in a given market, producing identical output (homogeneous, standardized product - just like perfect competition). The decision each firm has to make is: How much output should I try to sell, given what I think the other producer might try to sell? Firm #1 decides on q 1 Firm #2 decides on q 2 Each firm has MC = AC = $2, no matter how much they produce (that is, TC 1= 2q 1ndTC = 22 ) 2 The key to this problem is that each firm chooses its own output, but price depends on BOTH firms decisions TC 1 2q 1 and TC 2 2q 2 and P = 14 - Q T and Q T q +1q 2 For example, if firm #1 chooses q 1= 2 then if q2= 2, P = 10 if q = 3, P = 9 2 if q2= 4, P = 8 On the other hand, if firm #1 chooses q1 = 3 then if q2= 2, P = 9 if q2= 3, P = 8 if q2= 4, P = 7 So, to repeat, the outcome (your profits, if you are one of the firms) depends not only on your decision but also on the other firms decision How to model this kind of decision? Economists use a concept known as Prisoners Dilemma Story: A robbery is committed, and police catch two ex-cons whom they strongly suspect of the crime. There is some evidence, but not enough to convict them of the robbery itself. Without more evidence, the best the prosecutor can do is convicting them of minor things that will earn TWO YEARS in jail. So police separate the two suspects and offer each of them the following offer: If you will confess, and if your partner denies the crime, we will let you off with 6 months in jail, and your partner will get 10 years in jail. If you both confess, you will both get 5 years. So, each prisoner has a problem (a dilemma). You dont know what your partner will do, but whatever he does, you are better off confessing: N If your partner denies the crime, you can get off with 6 months (instead of 2 years) by confessing N If your partner confesses, you are going to jail, but you end up with 5 years (instead of 10 years) by confessing So you confess, as does your partner (he faces the same dilemma), and you end up with 5 years each (instead of 2 years if you both deny the crime) Economists think of the Prisoners Dilemma as a classic Game Theory situation your payoff in the game depends on both your decision and the other persons decision. We treat this as a game and look at outcomes based on decisions. Collective well-being vs. individual well-being So lets construct a payoff matrix representing outcomes based on decisions: www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit