Class Notes (839,561)
Canada (511,396)
MGSC05H3 (39)
Lecture 10

MGTC45- Lecture 10

3 Pages
227 Views

Department
Management (MGS)
Course Code
MGSC05H3
Professor
Andrew Stark

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
Controversy surrounding the Privatization of the Pearson One Terminal Management  Mulroney signed a deal to privatize a consortium of mergers between  Succeeded by Kim Campbell  She called an election in 1993, her liberal opponent Jean Chretien said that he would rip up the agreement  He has all sorts of criticism against the tory government  He was elected in October 1993 and became PM  First thing he did was appoint Bob Nixon to investigate for 30 days on the deal that the Tories signed and advise on what he should do  It was expected that Bob Nixon would rip up the deal  Mergeco was upset by this because they had invested a significant amount to it  Saw privatization was a lucrative opportunity  Different governments have different views  They had to go to the one place in Canada that was friendly towards them  That place was the Senate of Canada  That is because the Senate is composed of appointments and doesn’t change their composition unless they resign at the age of 75  The Senate was dominated by Conservatives  The Senate decided to investigate by holding hearings by the business interests and critics  The Senate committee wasn’t totally conservative but was majorly so  Senators tend to be old  The media reported the arguments  The structure of the debate was interesting  The government had sought a deal where the government would get a good rate of return and the tories thought it would be good public policy (getting money back for taxpayers)  Liberals said that it meant would inevitably raise the fees to airlines and it would raise the price for customers and that wouldn’t be good public policy  Travellers would see ticket prices go up  The government had a response to that was that airports are monopolies  The traveller would have no choice and can’t go to another airport and fly out of it  The tories quoted Deloitte, accountant named Stelheim “anybody who believes airports are monopolies do not understand airports”  Airports do no monopolize  Paxport was competing with Clarage?  so they didn’t want to compete with anybody  Paxport made the argument to the gov’t that it was not strategic to give management to a foreign company  The Liberals said that those arguments are self-serving and they were not good public policy  Ray Hessian, in charge of Paxport’s bid o Made the arguments that a business would make arguments that are self-serving and it was pretty obvious o But you have to reach beyond yourself and show that there would be a benefit to society o His strength was to find public interest based terms  No Clarage as it would create a monopoly and didn’t want foreigners as they didn’t want the terminals controlled by an outsider  Charles Bronffman, took advantage of his meeting with the PM and asked if he could be put into the deal  PM told the public service to cu
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit