Class Notes (834,721)
Canada (508,692)
Philosophy (940)
PHLA10H3 (173)
Lecture

Aashna Thakkar

5 Pages
90 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHLA10H3
Professor
William Seager
Semester
Fall

Description
What is knowledge? • what is the diff between knowledge and belief? ◦ What is the point in saying, i don’t believe, i know! • Why is knowledge important ◦ sense of security, planning and ' building' • skepticism ◦ position claiming we have no knowledge ◦ does the skeptic claim that we can know that skeptictism is true • know how, know who, and know what ◦ three different ways we use the word 'know' ◦ is there a common factor? Necessary and Sufficient Conditions • necessary conditions ◦ when (if x then y) us true then I is necessary condition for x ▪ ex. oxygen is a necessary condition for a match lighting, living in Canada is a necessary condition for living in Canada • Sufficient conditions ◦ when (if x then y) is true Knowledge, belief, truth • knowledge implies belief • the belief- desire explanation system (folk psych) mental states: beliefs and desires • ex. John went to the fridge and got a beer ◦ Desire: john wanted a beer ◦ Belief: john believed beer was in the fridge • altering either belief or desire alters the action • desire is a mental state which represents the world as we wish it to become (goal) • belief is the stare which represents the worlds current 'configuration' • rationality is the ability to use beliefs to generate actions which transform the world to desired state • knowledge implies belief ◦ that is, if S knows P then S believs that P ◦ can we show this ▪ suppose that S knows that snow is white ▪ now suppose that S does NOT believe that snow is white ▪ what happens is we ask him whether snow is white? ▪ Is he says 'yes' then he must believe that snow is white (so long as he in sincere) ▪ is he says 'no' then he can't know that snow is white ▪ is he says 'i don’t know' then he cant know what snow is after all • is this a good argument ◦ exam situation: a 'guess' based on knowledge you don’t know you possess? • Knowledge implies truth ◦ that is, if S knows that P then P is true ◦ can we show this? ▪ Suppose S knows that snow is white ▪ now, suppose that snow is NOT actually white ▪ But, if somebody knows something you can rely on that. If someone knows that the bus leaves at 4:15 then you can rely on that ▪ you can reply on something if you know its true. You cant rely on the bus leaving at 4:15 if it really leaves at 4:10 ▪ is snow is actually NOT white, then we cant rely on its being white ▪ so if snow is actually NOT white, then S does not know that snow is white • Belief and truth are necessary conditions of knowledge • but they are not sufficient • to show that, we need a case where somebody believes something which is true, but they don't know it ◦ ex. Groundhog day • generally speaking, sometimes when one comes to believe something by accident which just happens to be true we will have a case of true belief which is not knowledge • ex. Knowledge and Justification • is something more needed besides truth and believing to turn a belief into knolwdge? • Lets call this extra thing justification • what is justification ◦ havinga good reason for a belief ◦ what kind of reasons ▪ prudential? No (even if you accepted Pascal's Wager, you would end up believing in Gods existance but not knowing that He existed) ▪ therfor evidential reasons • based on arguement? Not necissarily (we know some things 'directly'; ex. Pains) • Sober's moral analogy ◦ we sometimes talk about whether actions where morally justified or not ▪ in one sense of this idea, on is morally justified if ones actions do not violaet an of your duties of if one has a right to do the action • perhaps there a similar sense of 'epistemic justification' ◦ one is epistimically justified is one 'has the right' to belive or if one has fulfilled the duites one 'owes' to one's beliefs (or their formation) ◦ but what are these duties? ◦ Can one make a mistake and still be justified? • We might use the idea of 'virtue' here ◦ the morally virtuous person is one who does the right thing in the realm of action • The JTB theory of knowledge ◦ S knows that P is and only if ▪ P is true ▪ S believes that P ▪ S is justified in believing that P • The JTB theory explpains a great mnat knowledge claims ◦ i know that I live in toronto ◦ why? Its true, i believe it and there is justification • The JTB theory also explains • But the JTB theory seems to fail in some cases ◦ the principles of failure ▪ one can be justified in believing
More Less

Related notes for PHLA10H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit