Class Notes (839,094)
Canada (511,185)
Philosophy (940)
PHLA10H3 (173)
Lecture

Philosophy of Religion- Design and Being.odt

3 Pages
145 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHLA10H3
Professor
William Seager

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
Philosophy of Religion- Design and Being Aquinas's Argument from Design ◦ what is it to 'act for an end' ▪ to have an equal goal in action ▪ to have a function ▪ ex. the heart has a function of pumping blood; ipod plays music... ▪ also known as 'teleological' ◦ how bis is the realm of ends? ▪ Artifacts, organisms...? ▪ Aquinas (following Aristotle) thought the universe and the realm of ends were identical ▪ ex. falling objects are 'seeking' their natural place Aquinas's Argument ▪ some things have a function lack minds ▪ anything that has a function but lack mind, have been designed for something with mind ▪ therefor there is a 'designer' who created all such mindless things ▪ The designer is God ◦ Note Birthday Fallacy ◦ Note Aquinas's point of view: ▪ everything is teleological Structure of the Argument from Design ◦ Global versus Local Design Argument ▪ Global design relies on some general feature of the universe as a a whole • ex. the fine-tuning argument • hos of features of our world have to be almost exactly right, orelse we would not be here ◦ fine- structure constant, cosmological constant... ◦ note anthropic principle ▪ Global versus Local Arguments • rely on some particular or local feature of the world ◦ ex. bombardier beetle ◦ ex. the human eye ▪ without some specific parts, it could not funtion William Paley's Watch • ex. we find a watch on the beach, but we don’t know what it is ◦ two hypothises ▪ H1: it was a chance object created by the waves acting on the sand! ▪ H2: somebody built that thing to perform the function of keeping time ◦ the surprise element ▪ what is an argument by analogy • an analogy depends on some similarity between two things, lets call then the analog and the target • ex.bad analogy ◦ he had a handsome, rugged look of a chipmunk ◦ failure of similarity • what about this bad analogy ◦ she was as alone as someone with nor friends ◦ trivial similarity • this is a good analogy ◦ atoms are like little solar systems • and analogical argument works by extrapolation from the analog to an unknown feature of the target ◦ analog:the watch ◦ target: the universe (global design argument) ◦ target: organisms (local design argument) ◦ the analog has a property: being intellectually designed ◦ therefore the target has a that property • why does that follow ◦ things that are generally similar usually have a lot of things in common Hume's Criticism of the Design Argument • An analogy is only as good as the target
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit