Class Notes (923,199)
CA (543,146)
UTSC (33,027)
Philosophy (967)
PHLA10H3 (177)
Lecture 2

Week 2 Notes

4 Pages
143 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHLA10H3
Professor
William Seager

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Philosophy
Lecture Week 2
Notes
Pgs. 19-34
Inductive and Deductive Arguments
Deductive Validity
Conclusion cant say anything that wasn’t already contained in the premises
Nondeductive arguments are riskier
-but you gainyou can reach true conlclusions that go beyond premises
-risk is you may reach false conclusions from true premises
Nondeductive- go beyond premises and make conclusions
in a strong deductive nondeductive inference the premises make the conclusion
plausible
Two types of non-deductive inference
-inductive (particular to general)
-abductive (general to particular)
Inductive
Involves taking a description of some sample and extending that description to items
outside the sample
E.g.
60% of the county voters called are Democrats
Approx. 60% of the county are for Democrats
^ goes beyond what the premiss asserts
Two factors that affect how strong or weak arguments are
1. Sample size – bigger the better
2. representatives or unbiasedness -- random is better BUT doesn’t guarantee it
wont be biased
www.notesolution.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Philosophy Lecture Week 2 Notes Pgs. 19-34 Inductive and Deductive Arguments Deductive Validity Conclusion cant say anything that wasnt already contained in the premises Nondeductive arguments are riskier - but you gainyou can reach true conlclusions that go beyond premises - risk is you may reach false conclusions from true premises Nondeductive- go beyond premises and make conclusions in a strong deductive nondeductive inference the premises make the conclusion plausible Two types of non-deductive inference - inductive (particular to general) - abductive (general to particular) Inductive Involves taking a description of some sample and extending that description to items outside the sample E.g. 60% of the county voters called are Democrats Approx. 60% of the county are for Democrats ^ goes beyond what the premiss asserts Two factors that affect how strong or weak arguments are 1. Sample size bigger the better 2. representatives or unbiasedness -- random is better BUT doesnt guarantee it wont be biased www.notesolution.com
More Less
Unlock Document


Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit