Class Notes (809,279)
Canada (493,607)
POLC70H3 (38)
Lecture 3

LECTURE 3.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

University of Toronto Scarborough
Political Science
Jooyoung Lee

LECTURE 3: PLATOS REPUBLIC 1. Review of Last Lecture  Begins with debate on justice  Socrates explains what justice IS NOT (specifically, Thrasymachus' definition of justice being the advantage of the stronger  Plato's strategy to show what justice is: o Prove that justice is valuable as an intrinsic good (good in and for itself) but also as an instrumental good (good for something else) (the just life is essential or a happy life)  The Analogy: The just city must also be a happy city (Justice in the soul is justice in the city) o Justice in the city requires that all members to their own work; similarly, justice in the soul requires that the parts perform their own function  Who should rule the city? o Plato (III.412c: Only the best should rule--aristoi)  But who is the best?  Linguistically, the Gr. word for 'best' (aristoi) is similar to the Gr. word for 'virtue' (arete)  Strong correlation b/w the two, hinting at, "the virtuous person is the best..."  According to Plato, the best ruler is a philosopher (better yet, a philosopher-king) 2. The Philosopher-King: The Best Ruler  The kallipolis (ideal city) can only come into existence when (V.473c;VI.499a-c) when "philosophers rule as kings or those who are called kings and leading men genuinely and adequately philosophize, that is, until political power and philosophy entirely coincide"  What is philosophy, and who is a philosopher? o II.275e-376b: "The philosopher is like a dog"  Dog treats what he doesn't know as an enemy, but loves what it knows o Problem of false philosophers: there are some who seem to be like philosophers but are not true philosophers. They are not lovers of wisdom, instead, they are (V.475d-476d) "lovers of sights and sounds"  Difference between: o Those who love only the sights and sounds of things  Most people (false philosophers) can perceive sights and sounds of beautiful things o Those who love the nature of the thing itself permanent and unchanging  Only philosophers can understand the permanent nature of beauty- what makes something beautiful  Plato's theory of knowledge o Three types of knowledge about beauty o Knowledge To know not only examples of beauty, but what beauty is in itself (the form, idea of beauty in itself) o Opinion To know only instances of beautiful things, but not beauty in itself 3. Ignorance Not to know anything about beauty (= the absence of knowledge or opinion) o Remember, In Book 1, Socrates said: "I know nothing". The Socratic method merely establishes ignorance, but does not give us an opinon or knowledge of justice o Plato's point: only the philosopher can give us true knowledge.  Most others can give us-at best- an opinion  Should government be based on opinion? Public opinion?  The Allegory of the Cave o The Political meaning of the Cave Allegory  The 'best rulers' do not rule from ignorance or opinion; they rule only from knowledge  Only philosophers have knowledge- like the liberated prisoner who left the cave  But lovers of opinion or ignorance are not philosophers (can only see the shadows on the wall); and for that very reason, they are not qualified to rule.  If you dont govern according to reason, necessarily you must be governing from opinion or ignorance. That is why:  VI.484d: "it would be absurd to choose anyone but philosophers as rulers of the ideal city. Philosophers govern only according to reason and by virtue, unlike others... (not finished)  Why are philosophers best suited to rule? o Consider those who are not philosophers Sophists Tried to teach ability to engage in fraudulent behaviour and claimed to have knowledge (but in actuality only had opinion. Democrats Anyone can be in a position to rule (note: in classical Greece, election was rare, and position of power were enacted by lottery) And... Those driven by appetites and not governed by reason  Implications for Plato's ideal city: o VI.503b: The guardians must be philosopher-kings  In other words, money-makers and auxiliary classes must be excluded from government  Political exclusion: If the aristoi is to rule, it means that the demos (the masses, the poor, the people) must never rule. Democracy can never be the best form of rule. The people lack virtue (arete)  Problems with Philosopher Kings  Not everybody can be a philosopher-king, because true philosophers are so rare o See VI.494a, VI.497b-c, VI.503-4  'mass politics' is suboptimal: VI.497b "none of our present constitutions is worthy of the philosophic nature"-- including democratic Athens o Two Emerging models of politics  Mass Politics: The kind of democratic politics with the dispersal of power (democracy)  Elite Politics: Power is concentrated within a small circle of individuals. Which is the best answer to our question about political leadership? Who governs better (a small group or varied)?  No true philosopher really wants to rule o Remember I.347d: "In a city of good men, if it came into being, the citizens would fight in order NOT to rule" o VII.520d: "A city whose prospective rulers are least egar to rule must of necessity be most free from civil war" o VII.591c-d: "Philosophers must be forced to rule. "We mustn't allow them to do what they're allow to do stay there (outside the cave/public life) and refuse to go down again to the prisoners in the cave"  Knowledge of philosophers must be shared with those who are ignorant or unaware Philosophers have a bad reputation  o Vicious our useless, not honoured, btu slandered in the cities o Is philosophy compatible or incompatible with democracy? o Political Inequality as central to Plato's thought: if 'the best' rule, it means others must obey. Inequality is essential to justice. But doesn't this create resentment within the city? Wouldn't the disenfranchised (excluded) want to rule?  If 'the best' exist, by definition, those who do not satisfy conditions of being the best are less than that. o Analogy of the ship and the ship captain (VI.486e-489a): 'Ships resemble cities and their attitude to the true philosopher' Is there such a thing as an 'unqualified' political ruler? Plato thinks yes: Just as there can be an unqualified ship captain (one who doesn't know the art of navigation), so too can there be an unqualified ruler (one who doesn't know the art of government). → an untrained person will endanger others, that is why you need a chain of command  If the 'best; are truly in control, is there any need for law? o An Analogy: Does the master-chef need a cookbook to make her dishes? Does the best doctor need a medical handbook to practice medicine? o If the answer is no, then why would the best ruler need law to practice the art of government? o Another contrast:  Rule of Law  Rule of (the best) man o You would nee
More Less

Related notes for POLC70H3

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.