Class Notes (836,100)
Canada (509,630)
Psychology (7,782)
PSYB32H3 (614)
Lecture 4

PSYB20 - Lecture 4.docx

4 Pages
101 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYB32H3
Professor
Mark Schmuckler
Semester
Fall

Description
PSYB20 – Lecture 4 Prof’s Speech - Purple Slide 2 – Age Norms for Important Motor Milestones - Motor capabilities are probably the most obvious and present indicator of helplessness of an infant - Newborns at best move head, kick; have uncoordinated motor skills - Human newborn motor milestones occur within the first few months - Motor skills development takes place in fairly definitive stages - Achievement of motor milestones is not related to intellectual development - Body dimensions of infants typically play a role in their motor milestone achievement - Motor development doesn‟t stop at 24 months, but continues into adulthood; throughout entire lives, which means that there are many motor skills we can talk about, but we will focus on walking and reaching Slide 3 – Necessary Skills for Visually-Guided Reaching - Visually-guided reaching occurs when we can accurately reach for and grasp an object in our visual field - Prominent skill that develops in first months - Perceptual skills o Object recognition  Have to be able to perceive objects  Depth perception requires motor skills o Figure-ground separation - Motor skills o Arm and hand coordination o Fine-motor coordination and control - Visual-motor integration and coordination o Involves Visual guidance of the hand o And the right Timing of the grasp  For moving objects, we have to perceive and predict where it will move; reach for where you think the object will be Slide 4 – The Normative Sequence of Reaching - 1 – 2 Months o Begin to see isolated components, i.e. perceptual components are fixated o Glance at objects when present o Begin to fixate objects for 5-10 sec o Arms not organized with vision  Motor abilities do not necessarily coordinate with vision - 2 – 3 Months o Isolation of components breaks down  Visual-motor coordination appears o Focus on objects o Beginning of prehensory behavior o Raise hand towards object  Can make relatively accurate swipes at an object  Can hit and bat, maybe not grasp  Being to see raising of hand, but not actually trying to grasp - 3 – 4 Months o Mutual grasping, 1 or 2 hands  Grasping is seen – just as likely with 2 hands as it is with 1 hand o Sometimes turn torso towards object  Begins to orient body toward object - 4 – 5 Months o Integrated looking and grasping o “Top-level” reaching  Even timing is accurate o Good grasping of object  Good hold of object (stationary object) Slide 5 – Type of Contact with a Moving Object - Von Hofsten & Lindhagen (1979) o Carried out a longitudinal study with 12-24 week old babies at 3 week intervals until 30 weeks and then at 36 weeks o Von Hofsten - reaching for a moving object is much more difficult because you have to extend the arm with a trajectory of the object is moving - Graph: The number of reaches at each speed and age, expressed as a proportion of the maximum number of possible reaches (3 per condition). o Had the infants reach for moving objects at different speeds – slow, medium, fast o Researchers looked at reactions – reaches occurred at the same time as when the infant started to fixate o Infants are more likely to reach for slower moving objects, but the graph doesn‟t show successful reaching Slide 6 – Type of Contact with a Moving Object - Graph: The type of contact with the object. Proportion of total number of reaches for “grasp,” “touch,” and “miss.” o Infants rarely miss o “touch” but no grasp – goes down with age o Touch and grasp – goes up with age o At 18-20/21 weeks, grasping outperforms touching o Grasping of stationary and moving objects occurs at the same age Slide 7 – Reaching with hands vs. feet - Esther Thelen o Noted that while reaching with the arm is interesting, it is difficult for infants to control their arms and much more so than their legs – partly because of body dimensions, partly because of physiology o legs are capable of fewer movements o If body constraints are important, infants should be better at reaching with their legs o Compared timing for reaching with the hands versus reaching with the feet  Tested 8-15 week olds longitudinally (weekly)  Presented with toy at midline between shoulders, and midline of hips to see which (arms or legs) they used to reach o Timing of reaching with hands and feet:  Average age of first contact: Hands: 15.7 weeks; Feet: 11.7 weeks  More likely to contact object with their feet  Extended contact with object: Hands: 16, Feet: 11.8  Extended contact was more likely with feet than with hands, which suggests that infants are more coordinated/organized with their feet Slide 8 – Is Visually-Guided reaching a Myth? - Clifton, Muir, Ashmead, & Clarkson (1993) - Visually-guided reaching reflects that there is something special in vision with reaching; we use vision to guide our hands to the object - Rachel Clifton (aka Rachel Keen) – if vision is more important to reaching, reaching should be more successful in the light than in the dark - Reaching in the light vs the dark graphs: if vision is important
More Less

Related notes for PSYB32H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit