Class Notes (835,246)
Canada (509,047)
Psychology (7,776)
PSYB65H3 (519)
Ted Petit (310)
Lecture 9

Lecture 9

4 Pages
81 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYB65H3
Professor
Ted Petit
Semester
Fall

Description
Lecture 9  Lateralization: the brain is not bilaterally the same, functions differ in each hemisphere - Historical perspective (WW2, brain damage in adults) • Adult patients with left hemisphere (LH) damage:  During hospital recovery it was found that 100% of these patients (when bullet wound was in LEFT side showed some aphasic (aphasia is problems in language/speech) symptoms.  Approximately 30% will show some recovery, at varying degrees. Those that showed recovery were all left-handed/ambidextrous patients (LHP). Least amount of recovery was in right-handed patients.  Since 100% of patients showed some language problems with Left Hemisphere damage, clearly Left Hemisphere is associated with language. • Adult patients with right hemisphere (RH) damage:  Found in these patients that they showed very few language problems and rarely did it lead to complete aphasia.  The % of patients that did show aphasic symptoms with RH damage were all LHP. Furthermore, most patients showed recovery from language problems as a result of RH damage.  Right handed people (RHP) with RH damage did not show aphasia. For RH wounds, RHP don’t get aphasic symptoms. Right handed people only had problems when damage is in the Left hemisphere. Suggests that in RHP language is located on left side. In LHP, language is bilaterally represented (occurs in both hemispheres) because in LHP, damage to either hemisphere shows problems in opposite hemisphere. • RHP  Language is on LEFT Side, LHP  language is on BOTH sides • Recovery:  RHP: all language is LH. Damage to the LH equals lots of problems and virtually no recovery. There’s no language on the right so it can’t take over.  LHP, damage to either side results in language problems however you get recovery because the side that isn’t damage can process language and can compensate and learn, so there is some degree of recovery.  Development of Lateralization - Children (under age of 5) with damage to either hemisphere has equal probability of inducing aphasic symptoms, which tells us that there are equal amounts of language found on both sides of a child’s brain. However 100% of kids will show some recovery. - In children language is not yet lateralized, because there’s language on both sides similar to left handed and ambidextrous people. - Over the course of development, language slowly becomes lateralized to one side. (E.g. In RHP, children are born with both sides capable of processing language, however over time RH loses ability to process language and lateralizes to LH.) - Neuroplasticity: ability of brain to change, store info, recovery from injury. - Brain is very plastic during development, loses plasticity in maturity/adulthood. - If a child does have severe brain damage what they will do is remove that damaged hemisphere because leaving it in there may result in epilepsy. The other hemisphere will then take over everything.  Acallosal patients (those without a corpus callosum) - In adults who were born without a corpus callosum, language is localized on both sides of brain. - Children with very extensive brain damage, language is always found on the other intact side. - It would appear then that when we’re born both hemispheres are capable of language acquisition. As we mature, and begin to develop language that the LH seems to be more dominant for language in individuals. - It would appears because of the fact that a person has damage to LH, or because hemispheres aren’t connected that during development LH actively suppresses RH. - In individuals who are acallosal, language remains on the RH, but if connected, all language moves to LH. - Why is the LH more superior (mainly in right handed people)? • Left temporal lobe contains planum temporale (PT) which is the primary language area in temporal lobe. PT in LH is larger, more convoluted, and heavier by about a third, suggesting that the LH speech area is anatomically more equipped to handle language. • Even in other apes left temporal lobe was also larger and heavier. It’s also true in other animals that communicate, such as birds. LH is anatomically larger than RH. • Throughout evolution there has been a predisposition for vocal communication to be localized in the LH. • LHP have anatomical advantage due to larger LH for language even though there’s language in both sides. st • Can also be seen in infants and even before birth (10-31 week of pregnancy). • Larger anatomical structure in left temporal lobe, language acquisition is not due to experience, it’s an evolutionary genetically carried predisposition for vocal communication to be stored on LH.  Normal patients - Sodium amytal
More Less

Related notes for PSYB65H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit