Class Notes (839,559)
Canada (511,394)
Psychology (7,818)
PSYC12H3 (387)

PSYC12 week 10 lecture notes

3 Pages

Course Code
Michael Inzlicht

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Week 10 PSYC12 Lecture 10 – Reducing Prejudice and its effects Reducing Prejudice - Pessimism in prejudice research o This class has focused on almost the dark side of psychology  Stereotypes are functional & adaptive (stereotypes are just one other way we learn)  Our world conspires to make us more prejudiced  Stereotypes are automatic, implicit; inevitable?  Prejudice has long term effects on targets o What about the bright side? What can we do to improve situation? Individual Approaches (approaches that target any one person) - Context & Associations o Putting people of different races and gender on billboards and advertisements is not just lip service; actually promotes diversity and tolerance o It makes them appear more human and outside of their stereotyped arenas o Implicit stereotypes change depending on context  Wittenbrink et al., 2001  Movie and IAT (people who saw movie with positive associations of black people had more positive IAT with black people than people who saw movie with negative associations of black people)  Priming in context (people saw full bodied black people in 2 different settings: church or graffitied urban city. People have different associations depending on the background) o Implicit stereotypes change after training  Kawakami & Phills (2007) > Joystick study  Certain muscles in our body is associated with certain tendencies  Action of biceps is approach and action of triceps is avoid  People who were instructed to approach black faces and avoid white faces showed less pro-white bias using IAT - Counter-stereotypic role models o Can exposure to counter-stereotypic people reduce implicit prejudice?  How do positive role models affect prejudice o Women’s colleges present natural experiment into how women’s beliefs are shaped by exposure to women in counter-stereotypic leadership positions  Compare women in co-ed vs. all women’s colleges - Dasgupta & Asgari, 2004 o Hypothesis:  Women in women’s college will have less stereotyped views of women than women in co-ed colleges  This difference is due to exposure to counter-stereotypical women, not to pre-existing differences o Method: women in women’s vs. co-ed colleges o Women in math vs. non-math classes o DV: IAT > Male + Leader/Female + Supporter vs. Female + Leader/Male + Supporter o Results show that women who go to women’s colleges show a smaller bias toward male+leader and female+supporter. In second year, women that go to women’s college do not show that bias, but favours women. However, women that go to coed college show greater bias toward male+leadership and female+supporter from first to second year Week 10
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.