Class Notes (836,580)
Canada (509,856)
Psychology (7,783)
PSYC31H3 (68)
Lecture

PSYC31 NOTE4.docx

5 Pages
104 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC31H3
Professor
Konstantine Zakzanis
Semester
Winter

Description
***midterm: ppt Comparison Standards for Deficit Measurement - The concept of behavioral deficit presupposes some ideal, normal, or prior level of functioning against which the patient’s performance may be measured. - Typical norm, e.g. digit span – 2 not necessarily means abnormal. - Balance of probability - Comparison standard, normative derived from an:  Appropriate (normative population)  Individual (derived from the patient’s history or present characteristics), depending on the patient, the behavior being evaluated, and the assessment purpose. - Neuropsychological assessment uses both normative and individual comparison standards for measuring deficit, as appropriate for the function or activity being examined and the purpose of the examination. - Be aware of judgmental biases when estimating pre-morbid abilities  E.g. Greek man and Counter-transference  Confirmation bias – going into certain clinics – get certain diagnosis  Court/ Education vs. IQ test/ - The population average  The normative comparison standard may be an average or middle (median) score  Check stratified variables, such as age, cultural background, gender, education, time period (can be outdated – W, information about certain person, e.g. musician), SES, (lack accessibility to resources, more stress), occupation  Not stratified by neurological disorders: normal = healthy  Add 1 variable = more time and resources   Most= 1 S.D. below and above average  Average  2 S.D. below  Low Average  3 S.D. below  Borderline Score  Low  very borderline  2 S.D. above  Above average  3 S.D. above  Superior  Highest  very superior  68%, 1SD  98%, 2SD  99%, 3SD - For adults, the normative standard, or norm, for many measurable psychological functions and characteristics is a score representing the average or median performance of some more or less well-defined population - And it is stratified by important demographic characteristics can you think of any? - The overall distribution of performance tends to be skewed in the direction of abnormal scores as a few persons in any randomly selected sample can be expected to perform poorly, while nature seems to set an upper limit on such aspects of memory span…  IQ, reading, comprehension, reaction time  Ceiling effect - Limitations of Normative Standards  Comparisons with population averages do not add significantly to the information conveyed by the test scores alone, for most test scores are themselves numerical comparisons with population norms  When examining patients for adult-onset deficits, only by comparing present functioning with prior functioning can the examiner identify real losses  In other words, we don’t know what the person’s pre morbid abilities were like…. - The Measurement of Deficit (Individual)  Direct Measurement of Deficit o One way deficit can be assessed directly is when there are normative comparison standards for the behavior in question (e.g., inability to copy a simple drawing or t
More Less

Related notes for PSYC31H3

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit